In Europe and now Asia, a search for ‘common destiny’

China has adopted the EU’s slogan of ‘common destiny’ for creating a Eurasian economy. Yet the EU’s many new woes call for redefining the core values, or identity, of its union.

Reuters
A European Union flags flutters outside the EU Commission headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, May 20.

The European Union must be doing something right. Its oft-repeated slogan about a “common destiny” for its 500 million people has become the catchphrase for China in a campaign to bind its neighbors into a community.

Just what kind of community China envisions is still not clear. Chinese President Xi Jinping calls for building a “Eurasian” economy, which would likely place China, as the world’s second largest economy, at the center. Mr. Xi has launched a special bank to build infrastructure throughout the region. He plans to spend a large portion of China’s wealth on projects dubbed “Silk Road,” or the construction of new routes by land and sea to transport people and goods.

As China may soon learn, words like “common” and “destiny” are difficult for even the EU to define today.

The EU’s origins in the 1950s were at first also based on shared economic interests, with the hope of reducing the extreme nationalism that drove two world wars and to eventually form a political union based on democratic values.

But after more than a half century of progress, the EU is struggling over its identity. It faces the potential exit of Britain, which promises to hold a referendum in 2017 about its EU membership. Greece’s financial woes may force it out of the eurozone. Hungary speaks of “parting ways with western European dogma” and admires Russia’s authoritarian ways. Migration woes and high unemployment have led to political splits and a rise in right-way parties. And Russia’s aggression against Ukraine over its drive to join the EU has revealed serious cracks in Europe’s common security policies.

The EU’s many achievements in interdependence and stability have reached a critical point. It must find new ways to define a “common destiny,” or what German Chancellor Angela Merkel calls “the preservation of the European idea.”

In dealing with specific issues, such as anti-EU nationalism in England or the distorting dominance of German exports, the people of Europe must maintain the high tone of phrases such as “common destiny.” But they must put new meaning into them. Shared interests, such as free trade, are not enough, as material interests can be temporary. Shared values, such as common policies on human rights or free speech, are more long-lasting.

The EU has learned this the hard way. It formed a monetary union among 17 of its 28 members without making the difficult decision to unify political decisionmaking on government spending. This easing of credit led Greece and other nations to rack up serious debts. The lure of money overran the value of prudent spending and investment in the future.

Destiny is not fate nor is it a matter of taking what one wants. It is determined by what each person or nation brings to the table for the common good.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.