When 'bystander intervention' works

At the US military academies, students report a decline in unwanted sexual contact. One possible reason is new training in 'bystander intervention,' or preventing an assault when a person nearby speaks up or takes action. A Pentagon report adds legitimacy to 'good Samaritan' training at educational institutions.

|
AP Photo
U.S. Naval Academy campus in Annapolis, Md.

A new report from the Pentagon reveals that the women and men at America’s military academies have experienced a decline in unwanted sexual contacts since 2012. One reason is better punishment of offenders, no doubt a result of reforms since recent sex scandals in the armed forces. But the report also points to progress in a new type of training in how to prevent sexual abuse.

A statistic from the Pentagon survey tells the story: 

Of those students at the Navy, Air Force, and Army academies who observed a high-risk sexual assault occurring or about to occur, more than 90 percent said they took some action to intervene. Men were almost as diligent as women in taking action or speaking up with a subtle hint or merited rebuke. 

This high rate of “bystander intervention” is remarkable. For other institutions dealing with problems from sexual assaults to binge drinking to suicides – especially at colleges – this provides hope for training people not to be passive or afraid when they see unethical or dangerous behavior in others. And it points to a key assumption in such education that individuals are fundamentally empathetic and can – with proper coaching – overcome fears of intervening in many situations. 

It also assumes that men are part of the solution to sexual assaults, not the problem.

The military academies are hardly alone in promoting bystander intervention. In recent years, hundreds of colleges in the United States have adopted programs such as Mentors in Violence Prevention and Green Dot. The National Football League has adopted such education for its players as a way to prevent domestic violence, child abuse, and sexual assault. 

Last fall, the White House launched a nationwide media campaign called “It’s on Us,” which aims to prevent sexual violence on campuses, mainly through bystander intervention. “It’s up to all of us to put an end to sexual assault,” Obama said in a public service announcement. “And that starts with you.” 

School leaders know that peer-to-peer support on campuses is essential to preventing harm, such as from drinking that leads to sexual attack. Dartmouth College plans to provide “bystander education” to students for each of their four years on campus. “True and lasting change will not come from top-down policies alone,” said Dartmouth President Phil Hanlon in a speech this month to students. “It will come from individuals and organizations committing to live up to a higher standard of behavior.”

The US military academies know they still have a big task in overcoming student resistance to such training. “Cadets expressed concern with being ‘that cadet’ not wanting to get a buddy in trouble or being responsible for another cadet’s departure from the academy,” the report stated. Cadets worry about social retaliation if they say something to another cadet about sexual treatment of others.

Training techniques in bystander programs vary in approach. Some focus on men’s attitudes, others are gender neutral. Whatever the technique, the message is the same: We are all our brother’s (or sister’s) keeper. As the Pentagon report indicates, good Samaritans to those in need can bring good results.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to When 'bystander intervention' works
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2015/0216/When-bystander-intervention-works
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe