Africa's test of unity over Ebola crisis

In a mark of progress and unity, the African Union finally sent its first-ever humanitarian mission to help curb Ebola. Then it reacted swiftly to a military takeover in Burkina Faso. The continent must create more cohesion in order to assist itself.

An aerial view shows a 100-bed Ebola treatment center in Liberia's capital Monrovia, Oct. 31. The center is to be staffed by Cuban and African doctors of the African Union.

Like those in the rest of the world, Africans were slow to respond to the three countries on the continent struck by an Ebola outbreak. Only in recent weeks have a number of African nations, institutions, and philanthropists sent volunteers or money. Yet it is a special mark of progress that the 54-nation African Union has now sent a humanitarian mission – its first ever – to help end the epidemic.

As a regional body, the AU is closely watched as a measure of affection and consensus among Africa’s 1.1 billion people. Up to now, the regional body has mainly attempted to douse wars with peacekeepers, such as in Somalia, and to prop up democracy with sanctions and the shaming of dictators, with limited success. Humanitarian missions were largely left to the West.

Perhaps the Ebola crisis will push African leaders to create a stronger solidarity of purpose, much like that in Latin America and perhaps someday like the European Union. Despite a globalized world, neighborhoods still matter.

Criticism of the AU’s slow response to Ebola may have helped push it to react swiftly last week to an Army takeover in Burkina Faso. The AU gave the military a two-week deadline to hand power to a civilian ruler or face sanctions.

One weakness of the AU is that many African leaders are like the one in Burkina Faso who was forced to flee, leading to the Army takeover. President Blaise Compaoré had tried to extend his 27-year rule by altering the Constitution, only to trigger a popular uprising. Leaders in Uganda and Chad have “legally” extended their rule while those in Rwanda and Congo may follow suit. Africa needs better models of governance.

With the Ebola crisis, Africa may be forced to find the unity it needs for change. Nigeria, with all its wealth and skills, was able to quickly curb its Ebola outbreak, as did Senegal. And the AU’s chairperson, Dr. Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, said this to an international gathering last week: “A few months into this crisis, and based on the experience gained, we know much more and are confident that we must, that we can and that we will, defeat this disease.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Africa's test of unity over Ebola crisis
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today