Election helps Ukraine be 'European'

Three pro-European parties gained a majority in Sunday's election for parliament. Now those parties must learn what the European Union still struggles with: unity in diversity.

Mykhaylo Okhendovsky, head of the Ukrainian Central Election Commission, walks past a screen displaying the partial results of the Oct. 27 parliamentary election.

A year-long struggle between Russia and Europe over the future of Ukraine took a decisive turn Oct. 26 – toward Europe. An election for a new Ukrainian parliament ended with three pro-European parties winning a majority. To end the country’s civil war and prevent Russian meddling, the new parliament must now become, well, European.

Yes, Ukraine is now a better democracy, one that must pass badly needed reforms. The election swept out a parliament whose corruption helped spark last November’s protests in Kiev. But what will make Ukraine look like the European Union it seeks to join?

The simple answer lies in the EU motto, adopted only in recent years after decades of struggles to resolve the Union’s many national differences: “United in diversity.”

Despite their pro-European tendencies, the three winning parties still need to learn how to honor their differences while working together on common interests and values. The EU is still learning this art of being both inclusive and principled. The Ukraine party of Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk (People’s Front) must get along with the party of President Petro Poroshenko (Bloc) while both must accommodate a surprising election winner, the Samopomich (Self-help) party. Each party has its own reformist agenda.

Ukraine can take some tips from the outgoing chief executive of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso. In a farewell speech, he summed up his 10 years in office with this advice: “The way to solve the problems we have in Europe is not through revolution and even less through counterrevolution. It’s by compromise, it’s by reform.” 

The former Portuguese prime minister should know of what he speaks. During his tenure, the EU membership has nearly doubled to 28 members. It has endured a constitutional crisis. And since 2009, it has both united and divided during a debt crisis that has turned into an economic crisis. “The risk of fragmentation and disunity was a real and present danger,” said Mr. Barroso.

Along the way, the EU almost lost Greece as a member of the eurozone and saw a referendum on Scottish independence that could have triggered other secessionist split-offs. 

No wonder the EU was given the Nobel Peace Prize in 2012. 

Ukraine’s newly elected leaders must not only find a balance of power among themselves but also find a way to decentralize power in order to accommodate the interests of the breakaway regions in the Russian-speaking east. Joining the EU will require more than democracy, free trade, clean governance, and human rights. It must learn what the EU has to continually learn. “Our union is strong because it respects diversity,” said Barroso. “For those who accept the fundamental rules of the club there is always a place, and there is always equality of treatment.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Election helps Ukraine be 'European'
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today