For 2014 election, the candidates to endorse

Even as more voters become hard ideologues, the middle grows for those who want candidates who can make compromises. The politics of trench warfare needs to change.

AP Photo
Independent candidate for the Senate, Greg Orman, talks to supporters in Shawnee, Kan. His candidacy may reflect a voter desire for politicians outside the norm.

No big surprise, but the Nov. 4 election for Congress is expected to result in a slight gain for Republicans. Elections, after all, are a necessary contest of ideas about governance. 

But the real story of the 2014 campaign might be this: More voters show a taste for politicians willing to meet their adversary halfway.

In the trench warfare of today’s American politics, acts of cooperation would be quite a stretch. Yet half of voters now say they favor candidates who would compromise on difficult issues rather than stick to their positions, according to a poll for The Wall Street Journal and NBC News. That is up from 34 percent just four years ago. 

In fact, voter support for breaking the partisan gridlock in Washington is as strong as that for job creation and economic growth (23 percent). And this public shift toward collaborative politics applies to all voters, whether Democratic, Republican, or independent.

Most polls and journalists tend to shove voters into competing camps, which only helps polarize politics or drive a sensational news story. Indeed, a Pew Research Center poll last spring found the proportion of Americans who identify themselves as hard-core liberals or conservatives has doubled since 2004 from 10 percent to 21 percent. And each side in that minority of voters is more likely to see the other as an enemy, or associate with those with similar views, or consume media that merely confirm their perspective.

A majority of Americans, however, still prefer to mix and match their views on issues, which may explain the rise in independents from 34 percent to 44 percent over the past decade. Many of these voters are Millennials, or those ages 18 to 32, who are disrupting normal politics with their distrust of traditional institutions in favor of digital activism and private-sector solutions. 

The percentage of Millennials who say government tends to be wasteful and inefficient has risen steadily to more than half. They reject the ideological stridency of their boomer parents and they seek other means of political engagement.

One election does not a trend make. Yet these latest polls hint that the 2014 vote might be more revealing than a slight power shift in Congress. They suggest Americans are looking more for what unites them. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to For 2014 election, the candidates to endorse
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today