North Korea's moment of truth about its gulag

In a first, a North Korean official confesses that the regime runs 'reeducation' labor camps. The admission hints at change and a possible rejection of Marxist notions about truth being subject only to the power relations of economic and social conditions.

AP Photo
Defectors from North Korea prepare to release balloons Sept 21 from South Korea carrying leaflets condemning North Korean policies, hoping to reach people in the closed country.

Sometimes history is made simply by shedding a lie. On Tuesday, North Korea admitted for the first time that, yes indeed, it has long maintained detention centers known as “reeducation through labor” camps. 

These are prisons where people out of step with the regime are sent – without charge or trial – to work under horrific conditions for the state. The five main camps were set up based on a communist belief that hard labor could alter a person’s political views and behavior, ridding them of “false consciousness.” 

Yet many of the North Korean prisoners, currently estimated at 90,000 to 120,000, do not survive their detention. They are simply locked away, often for the smallest sign of disloyalty. Beatings and executions are common, based on  tales from escapees.

Any progress in North Korea is welcome, especially if it can be sustained or entails an end to the regime’s denial of its gulag. The admission came at the same time as two high-level officials made a surprise visit to South Korea seeking to resume talks in November. Whether this opening signals a genuine attempt at establishing warm ties remains unclear, given the regime’s past reversals of its charm offensives. But at least North Korea has now come clean about the existence of the labor camps. 

The “hermit kingdom” has reason to open its shell a bit. A United Nations report earlier this year provided a detailed picture of human rights abuses in North Korea, saying the government had committed crimes against humanity that exceed “all others in duration, intensity and horror.” 

In addition, far more North Koreans can now watch smuggled DVDs or listen to foreign radio broadcasts. They share information about the better life in other countries, especially the demonized South Korea, which may make them question official propaganda.

Also, North Korea’s only ally, China, decided in 2013 to abolish its reeducation camps, releasing tens of thousands of detainees, four years after the UN criticized those camps as an “urgent human rights concern.” 

China certainly has other ways of jailing dissidents or political activists. But closing the camps, which dated back to the Mao era of the 1950s, seems to be a rejection of a Marxist theory that truth is subject to the power relations of social and economic conditions. That theory, now discredited, claims individuals are simply victims of powerful forces and not able to discern truth or claim individual rights. If a person speaks contrary to the Communist Party or acts in opposition, the best way to rid them of such behavior is to force them to do manual labor, as millions were made to do in China. 

North Korea’s confession about the camps is only a small step. But it hints at a possible shift in the regime’s thinking. Like China, which still has far to go to operate under rule of law, North Korea may be on a history-making path, one on which truth is not constructed on a theory but simply realized.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to North Korea's moment of truth about its gulag
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today