Rise of common folk in Brazil, India, Indonesia

New and popular politicians in the developing world's largest democracies come from humble origins. This trend reflects an 'equality of conditions,' or free societies that come to see dignity in each individual.

Reuters
Presidential candidate Marina Silva of the Brazilian Socialist Party speaks during a Sept. 8 campaign visit to the Unibes Foundation which offers aid to the needy.

Narendra Modi, the newly installed prime minister of the world’s largest democracy, India, is the low-caste son of a tea-stall owner.
 
Joko Widodo, the president-elect of the third largest democracy, Indonesia, was a furniture maker only a decade ago.
 
And Marina Silva, the most popular candidate in a presidential race in the fourth largest democracy, Brazil, grew up in poverty in an Amazon jungle town. As a child, she tapped rubber trees and taught herself to read at age 16.
 
Taken together, the humble origins of these three leaders mark quite a political shift in the developing world’s largest democracies. From their childhoods living on the fringes of society, they are now challenging each country’s tradition of governance by a ruling elite.
 
Their ascendancy represents what Alexis de Tocqueville noted about America’s early decades as a democracy – its “equality of conditions.” In the context of freedom, each individual is afforded the dignity and opportunity to rise up in society through achievement rather than entitlement. It was, after all, during Tocqueville’s tour of the United States in the 1830s that a "man of the people,"Andrew Jackson, was the country’s first “populist” president. A similar phenomenon may now be under way in India, Indonesia, and Brazil.

Of the three leaders’ trajectories, Ms. Silva’s rise may be the most dramatic. If she wins an October election against incumbent President Dilma Rousseff, she will be Brazil’s first “poor, black” president, as she puts it. Her unadorned style reflects a rising demand among Brazilians for clean and efficient government. Protests erupted last year over corruption in spending on the World Cup. Brazil also has one of the world’s largest income disparities. As an “outsider,” Silva is seen as able to break up a corrupt establishment.
 
All three leaders know enough about the “little people” that they promise the most mundane things. In India, Mr. Modi pledged in a major speech to provide indoor toilets and bank accounts for the poor. At the same time, he also ran on a platform to help everyone regardless of creed, caste, or religion. His rise has inspired young people to ask him, “How can I become prime minister?”
 
In Indonesia, the Oct. 22 inauguration of Mr. Widodo (widely known as “Jokowi”) has sparked panic among the longtime ruling political families. His rise was made possible under recent measures allowing direct elections for mayors and regional governors. As mayor of Surakarta and later governor of Jakarta, he was a “man of the people,” broadening opportunities, curbing corruption, and keeping bureaucrats on their toes with regular inspections. Now the elite in the House of Representatives want to pass a law that would give only local parliaments the power to appoint local leaders.
 
Perhaps because of their roots, these leaders tend to govern more by merit than by political considerations. Coming from a background of humility, they may realize that the way up for all people is through practical, selfless measures. Tocqueville speaks of “self-interest well understood,” or the virtues of a democratic republic such as service and opportunity that are within the grasp of everyone. That aspect of democracy is worth noting, especially in giants like these three countries.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.