Redefining age in aging societies

To keep ahead of an aging society, Britain now has an 'older workers' champion.' The big task, as more people in advanced nations put off retirement, is to shift attitudes about what is 'old.'

AP Photo
Indians participate in celebrations to mark International Day of Older Persons in Ahmadabad, India, Oct. 1, 2013.

Britain may be the first country to appoint an “older workers’ champion.” Last month, pensions expert Ros Altmann was given the task to challenge outdated perceptions of the elderly and rewrite the rules on early retirement.

Her key message to employers and even workers themselves: A person’s talents and experience don’t stop at age 65.

Dr. Altmann’s appointment reflects two trends in wealthier nations. More people are retiring later. And many governments are reversing policies that encourage early retirement.

A host of factors go into a person’s decision to retire, such as money, job availability, life expectancy, and health. But says Altmann, “Too many people retire when they are still capable of making a strong contribution.”

Like many countries, Britain wants to stay ahead of a sharp demographic curve. By 2020, the world will have 13 “super-aged” nations, up from just three today, according to a new report by Moody’s, the credit rating agency. (A super-aged country has more than 1 in  5 people who are 65 or older.) By 2030, the number of these countries will be 34 – and include many developing countries.

To offset the effects of an aging society, governments need to shift public thinking about the abilities of older people. In Britain, that began in June with a government action report called “Fuller Working Lives.” Its main point: “Our attitudes towards older workers must evolve to meet the challenge.”

Governments must move fast. Among 20 advanced countries, most have seen more baby boomers staying in the workforce since 2007, according to a study by the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank. Much of that trend is likely caused by the recent recession.

But the study also suggests employers must make more room to keep older workers who want to keep working:

“Although some observers are pessimistic about the willingness of employers to accommodate the special needs of an aged workforce, such pessimism may be misplaced. Employers have created millions of part-time jobs to accommodate the needs of students and mothers who are only available to work short weekly hours.... Comparable accommodations could be made for the special needs of older workers.”

Today’s older workers are more educated than their predecessors, allowing them to adapt to flexible hours and be retrained for new skills. Before such reforms can happen, however, employers need improved views.

“To start a reform revolution, it will be very useful to revise and adjust the conventional measurement of aging, in particular the definition of the onset of being considered ‘elderly’ or ‘old,’ ” writes Robert Holzmann of Australia’s Center of Excellence in Population Aging Research in a 2013 scholarly article.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.