A peaceful path to a Kurdish homeland

The advance of the Islamic State in Iraq opens an opportunity for Kurds to seek an independent state. But they must be cautious and ensure such a move does not trigger violence. The Middle East needs examples of peaceful means of change.

Reuters
Kurdish forces known as peshmerga stand guard in Kirkuk June 24.

For nearly a century, any map of the world has had to be revised frequently as nations were either conquered, split up, or newly created. The key question in each case was whether the border shifting was done peacefully and by consensus.

Now that question must once again be asked as the 5 million ethnic Kurds in largely Arab Iraq move closer to a vote on independence.

A peaceful secession of Iraqi Kurdistan would be in marked contrast to the extreme violence employed by the jihadist group Islamic State (previously known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant), which proclaimed a Muslim caliphate last month. And it would stand out against the recurring violence used by Hamas in Gaza to gain a Palestinian state.

The Kurds have been a patient people in their long desire for independence. After World War I, they were denied a homeland by European powers who carved up the Middle East. With each new conflict thrust upon them in their mountainous areas, they have steadily taken steps to win more autonomy while also trying to show they can run a secular, peaceful democracy. This has earned them much respect.

Their caution has been necessary because the entire population of some 25 million Kurds is spread across four countries – Iraq, Syria, Iran, and Turkey – where they are minorities. Secession of Kurds in even one country would be difficult enough.

Yet the rapid advance of the Islamic State group in the Sunni areas of Iraq has created an opportunity for a Kurdish state.

The Islamic State’s advances against the fleeing Iraqi Army left behind several critical conditions for the Kurds. Their security forces, known as peshmerga, were forced to defend the city of Kirkuk, which they consider their “Jerusalem.” The city’s rich oil reserves could potentially provide wealth for an independent state. And the new territory under Islamic State’s control also cut off the Kurdish region from the rest of Iraq.

All this, plus the political turmoil in Iraq over creating a government not dominated by Shiites, provides an opening for Kurds to seek a referendum on independence, perhaps starting first in Kirkuk.

Other states are lining up to either support or oppose this move. Iran and the United States are against the move as they prefer a unified Iraq. Turkey and Israel are for it, as they could buy Kurdish oil. In addition, the three main factions of Kurds are divided over the extent of independence.

Kurds must remain true to their past caution by ensuring a peaceful move toward secession. Any action that would precipitate war could derail their dreams and possibly create another major conflict. One fallback would be to achieve greater autonomy with guaranteed Kurdish control over Kirkuk and its oil exports.

Revising the world map yet again must not be done with violence.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.