How Nigerians can thwart Boko Haram

Foreign help for Nigeria to rescue the girls abducted by Boko Haram only highlights the government's failings, notably corruption. To dry up support for such militant groups, Nigerians must put an end to graft in high places.

AP Photo
President, Goodluck Jonathan is pictured on a billboard in Abuja, Nigeria, as part of campaign against Boko Haram and its abduction of teenage schoolgirls.

A host of nations are sending military aid and other assistance to Nigeria for the rescue of more than 200 girls abducted by Boko Haram. To Nigerians, however, the surprise outpouring of compassion only puts a spotlight on their own government’s many failings. To keep Boko Haram and other militant groups from further terrorist acts, many say, Nigeria needs basic reforms. And that starts with putting an end to corruption.

In large part, Boko Haram’s origins lie in a frustration by its late founder, Muslim preacher Mohammed Yusuf, over corruption. He offered a radical version of Islam as a solution for official graft. The group has since been able to recruit hundreds of alienated youth in the poverty-racked Muslim north where corruption is rampant. It can buy sophisticated weapons from corrupt members of the Nigerian military. And it can easily pay for tip-offs from local police about government moves against Boko Haram.

Under President Goodluck Jonathan, Nigeria has largely used a military strategy against Boko Haram. Only in March did the government offer a “soft” strategy to counter the root causes of terrorism. One aim of the strategy is rapid economic development of the north in a hearts-and-minds campaign. But similar economic initiatives in the past have largely ended up lining the pockets of officials.

The first task is clean governance. Nigeria already has two major anti-corruption agencies, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offenses Commission. One private activist group, CLEEN Foundation, set up a website last year that allows anyone to report demands for bribery by local police (stopthebribes.net). But far more needs to be done to rid Africa’s largest economy from a culture of impunity toward corruption.

The shock from Boko Haram’s mass kidnapping could bring the political momentum needed for Nigerians to act. From Turkey to Brazil to India, anti-corruption campaigns have sprung up in recent years, triggered by flagrant government failings. An educated middle class, fed up with petty bribery, usually leads the protests. But it is the poor who would benefit most from effective programs from a clean government.

Good governance in Nigeria will help keep poor, young men from joining radical insurgencies. “The current challenges facing our country demonstrate the importance of working together across geopolitical zones, political party lines, and ethnic-religious affinities to defeat our common enemies – poverty and corruption,” said one governor, Muazu Babangida Aliyu, of Niger State last week. He called for Boko Haram to be defeated within three months.

Nigeria’s economy is growing at 7 to 8 percent, but less than a third of its people have faith in their government. With the world spotlight now on Nigeria, its people have an opportunity to dry up the swamp of corruption that allows militants to thrive. Foreign aid will not do that. Only the people can.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.