Tie GM apology to action

After news that it delayed a recall of cars with potentially lethal defect, GM apologies and puts remorse into action with reforms. Words of contrition these days must come with deeds.

Reuters
General Motors Co.'s chief executive Mary Barra has been heavily focused on a scandal over a delayed recall since she learned of the issue in late January, about two weeks after she took over as the industry's first female CEO.

In a video released Monday, General Motors chief executive officer Mary Barra offered an apology for two mistakes made by the world’s second largest automaker. One was for a faulty ignition switch put in 1.6 million vehicles that has been linked to a dozen fatalities. The other was perhaps more difficult to admit: GM knew about the deadly defect for nearly a decade.

“Something went wrong,” Ms. Barra said. “And terrible things happened.”

In this new era of easy apologies by companies, politicians, and celebrities that have erred, the new CEO of GM didn’t spend much time expressing remorse for either the harm caused or the coverup (dubbed “Switchgate”). After all, she has been CEO only for a few weeks.

Rather, in a sign of how much the public expects public contrition these days to be tied to action, the GM chief announced steps to fix the company’s bureaucracy. She also promised to enhance the company’s future. “We will be better because of this tragic situation, if we seize the opportunity,” she told GM employees.

One immediate reform that Barra announced: creating a powerful post to oversee product safety. “Deciding and managing recalls is going to change because of this,” she pledged.

Despite the promise of reform and a start to a bumper-to-bumper internal investigation of the firm, GM will still pay mightily for its long delay of an important recall. Consumer lawsuits, government probes, and fines by regulators will eat into both prestige and profits just as the company is emerging from bankruptcy and government stewardship since its near-downfall in 2008-09.

Barra seems braced for a period of necessary suffering. The more willingly GM accepts its various punishments and understands the effects of its mistakes, the sooner its employees will start to operate at a standard of perfection. And as GM becomes more transparent and accountable, its past sins may be seen as ancient history.

The company can look to any number of role models for how to recover.

It can look to its chief competitor, Toyota, which has largely recovered from a massive recall in 2009-10 for vehicles with unintended acceleration. Or it can look to Netflix, which humbly retreated from a recent price increase that it recognized had been imposed with insensitive arrogance on consumers. Or to postwar Germany, whose sincere introspection on its Nazi past has enabled it to act as the moral leader in recent weeks in standing up to Russia’s illegal taking of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula.

Apologies are freeing, not because they relieve guilt but because they open a door to act in ways that prevent a repetition of old misdeeds. Remorse and reform are bound together just like a flat tire and car jack.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.