Honor the Olympic Truce

Terrorist bombings in Volgograd, Russia, may have had the Sochi Olympics as their real target. The ideal of the Olympics as a respite from violence must be defended.

Maxim Shemetov/Reuters
Russian police check a passerby in Sochi, Russia, Dec. 30. The International Olympic Committee says it has no doubt that Russian authorities will be able to provide security at the Winter Olympics that begin in Sochi Feb. 7. Two bomb blasts killed more than 30 people in the Russian city of Volgograd in late December.

The Olympic Truce may be under its greatest strain in some time after a pair of apparent terrorist bombings resulted in the loss of more than 30 lives, along with many others wounded, in the Russian city of Volgograd.

The 2014 winter Olympics are scheduled to open in less than six weeks in the Russian city of Sochi, on the Black Sea a few hundred miles southwest of Volgograd. Volgograd, formerly called Stalingrad, also stands as a symbol of Russian pride, the site where during World War II Russian troops stubbornly held onto the city and eventually turned back an invasion by Nazi troops.

The bombings may be the work of Chechen terrorists, though no one has claimed responsibility at this writing. Doku Umarov, the leader of Caucasus Emirate, a Chechen group, released a statement last summer vowing to use “maximum force” to disrupt the Games in Sochi. The US State Department has categorized his group as terrorists and offered a reward of as much as $5 million for information leading to his capture.

The concept of an “Olympic Truce” dates back to the original Olympic Games of ancient Greece, held nearly three millenniums ago. According to tradition a “laying down of arms” was declared for a period before, during, and after the competition, allowing competitors from many nations to participate in and travel to and from the Games in safety.

The Olympic Truce became an official part of the modern Games in 1993, when the United Nations passed a resolution in support of it. Today the symbol of the truce is a peace dove with the Olympic flame in the background.

Even before the bombings, elaborate security measures were being planned for the Sochi Olympic Games, which take place Feb. 7 to 23. Special troops will roam the surrounding mountains, speedboats will patrol the Black Sea coast, and aerial drones will keep watch overhead. No cars from outside the area will be allowed to enter the region beginning a month before the opening.

That tight security may itself have played a role in the Volgograd bombings. The city may have offered a “softer” target than the Games themselves.

Russian and Olympic officials have vowed to ensure that the Games go on as planned. “The entire international movement joins me in utterly condemning this cowardly act,” declared Thomas Bach, the incoming International Olympic Committee president.

Some reports indicate that the bombings might be the work of Muslim separatists in the Russian Republic of Dagestan, which, like its neighbor Chechnya, has bitter relations with Moscow. The two young brothers suspected of being responsible for the Boston Marathon bombings last April reportedly lived in Dagestan for a time.

The Olympic Truce puts forth the idea that, even if only for a limited period, people of all nationalities are capable of putting down their weapons, putting aside their disagreements, and celebrating together the highest ideals of humanity.

Terrorist acts are never the proper way to advance a cause. Attempting to tie such attacks to the coming Sochi Olympic Games will only win international condemnation.

What is to be cherished – and defended – at this time is the universal aspiration to live in peace and brotherhood, represented by the Olympic Truce.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.