How Ukraine can someday join the EU

Peaceful protests by Ukrainians in favor of a pact with the European Union reveal the brutal Soviet-style tactics of the regime. The EU must stand firm for democratic values.

Reuters
Protestors sing the national anthem during a demonstration in support of EU integration in Kiev Dec. 3. Embattled Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich faces turmoil on the streets over a decision to spurn closer ties with the European Union under pressure from Russia.

The European Union ran into a new iron curtain last month in its hopes of extending human rights, rule of law, and democracy to former Soviet-bloc states. Ukraine, after forceful arm-twisting by Russia, rebuffed an offer to start down the road toward EU membership, triggering mass protests.

The offer still stands for Ukraine to link up with the world’s largest economic union, a testament to the EU’s patient confidence that its “soft power” values will eventually attract people living to the east under corrupt, semidemocratic regimes. Georgia and Moldova, while much smaller than Texas-size Ukraine, did sign up for a future with the EU. They hope to join Poland and other former communist states that opted for the Union’s democratic freedoms and open markets.

A Ukraine that leans firmly toward Europe would help cement the EU project of creating a continent with long-term peace and prosperity. Polls in Ukraine show EU membership remains popular. But about half of Ukraine’s 46 million people are Russian-speakers who live in the east and south. Many of them prefer to remain a satellite state of Moscow, perhaps even joining a trade union, which has been proposed by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Mr. Putin’s economic threats against Ukraine to keep it from joining the EU reflect a historical strategy by Moscow to control its nearby states as buffers against potential enemies. Yet such a strategy runs counter to Russia’s more current inclination to rely on the global marketplace for trade and investment, reflected in its joining the World Trade Organization in 2012.

Yet Russia still has a lingering Soviet tendency to regard rights as coming from the state rather than seeing rights as naturally inherent in each citizen. This East-West divide was reflected in how Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych reacted to huge pro-EU protests in recent days. At 4 a.m. Saturday in the capital of Kiev, special riot police with clubs descended on peaceful protesters. The violent action led to hundreds of thousands of people protesting Sunday.

President Yanukovych fears losing a presidential election in 2015 if Russia retaliates with trade sanctions – as it did for a week last August. He also fears releasing his main political opponent, Yulia Tymoshenko, from prison, a condition for signing the EU agreement.

The EU may need to wait for that election – assuming Yanukovych doesn’t rig the voting as he did in a 2004 election – in hopes it will result in a leader who firmly seeks EU membership.

Like other Eastern Europeans, Ukrainians are moving toward the ideals of democracy, especially the notion that rights exist separate from the state. “The sacred rights of mankind,” Alexander Hamilton wrote, “are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of Divinity itself.”

The Soviet-era Iron Curtain fell more than two decades ago thanks in large part to the idealistic example set by the West. That example can still serve a reforming purpose for Ukraine.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.