Obama's pressing 'pivot' to Asia

Despite the government shutdown, Obama wisely plans to attend the Asian summits and show the US has staying power in shifting its foreign focus toward Asia – and balancing a rising China.

AP Photo
US Secretary of State John Kerry, center left, US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, left, Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida, center right, and Japanese Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera, join hands Oct. 3 as they exchange documents that call for more early-warning radar in Japan and surveillance drones to monitor islands in the East China Sea.

With a crisis in Washington, President Obama canceled half of his trip to Asia for next week. He still plans to attend the region’s two big summits of various Asia leaders in Bali and Brunei. Fortunately, more leaders than ever in Asia represent democracies. They, more than the authoritarian rulers, will understand his dilemma.

Asia’s democratic progress in recent decades bodes well for Mr. Obama’s still-unfulfilled plan to turn US foreign policy more toward the region. He has ample backing in Congress for his “pivot” to Asia. And polls show more than half of Americans see the region as the most important part of the world.

Still, US allies in Asia worry about Obama’s staying power. His cancellation of trips to the Philippines and Malaysia sends a symbolic message that the US is not a committed partner or a reliable counterweight to China’s growing military and economic clout.

Of America’s main interests in Asia – stable security, open trade, and an expansion of democracy – security remains the biggest worry. Obama has just begun to enhance the US military presence in the region despite budget cuts. That helps send a signal to China that its recent aggression on disputed islands must stop.

One result is that China has begun talks with Southeast Asian nations on a code of conduct regarding the maritime claims. This suggests China will not take islands by force, an action that could trigger war. But Beijing still has far to go to show its sincerity in resolving the island disputes peacefully according to agreed principles of behavior.

Obama has also quickened the pace of negotiations to create a regional free-trade pact known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership. With Japan now joining the talks, China may eventually be forced to climb on board, further pushing it to cooperate rather than bully its neighbors.

For the US, such a pact would mean the largest free-trade deal in its history, encompassing 40 percent of the world economy. He’ll need strong support in Congress to conclude the deal.

America’s role in Asia should be far more than that of simply a peacekeeper, focused mainly on making the region safe for commerce. Without more progress toward democracy in places such as Cambodia, Myanmar (Burma), and even Malaysia, Asia’s security and prosperity will remain shaky. Elected leaders are better able to find the right balance of cooperation and competition between nations.

Democracies are also more sympathetic when a domestic political crisis keeps a US president from attending a summit.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.