Today's democracy heroes are in the fiscal trenches

The West's years of unsustainable promises on spending are hardly a model of democracy. When elected leaders, such as Rhode Island treasurer Gina Raimondo, tell the truth on how to rein in costs, they are democracy's heroes.

AP Photo
A public union member wears a protest message on his shirt while rallying against the proposed pension legislation at the Illinois state capitol in Springfield last May.

The spread of democracy worldwide has stalled in recent years. One reason is obvious. Economic woes in Europe and the United States have revealed an unsettling fact: Politicians in many democracies have made unaffordable promises on spending.

Ask officials in China or any authoritarian country about the lure of democracy and they point a finger at the huge public debt of obligations caused by elected leaders from Greece to Washington to California over the years.

Why, they ask, move toward democracy if it means drowning in the red ink of unsustainable government benefits?

The recession, like a receding tide, has exposed some giant financial boulders. Democracies now need a new kind of hero, one that can “unpromise” past obligations to fit a new global economy and end this valid critique of democracy.

One unlikely hero is Gina Raimondo, the state treasurer in Rhode Island, the smallest of America’s 50 states by land mass. Over the past year, this Democrat has been sought out by many American politicians after she pulled off one of the most difficult fiscal reforms in a Western democracy.

She showed that transparent, realistic, and inclusive politics can tackle the most serious political challenge. Just two years ago, Rhode Island was among the worst states in the level of unfunded pension gap for public employees. Now it’s a model.

Elected in 2010, Ms. Raimondo was able to persuade various interest groups and finally the legislature to approve unprecedented reforms, not only for future state workers but current ones. She did it by revealing the real “math” about state spending, working with public unions, and by telling voters the consequences of inaction, such as lower spending on schools.

State pensions are among the largest costs facing democratic governments. For American states, they are estimated at between $2 trillion and $3 trillion. In Illinois, pension debts are now among the worst, with Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn even seeking a federal guarantee, or a potential bailout.

Since the 2008-09 Great Recession, most states have been forced to reduce these benefits to some degree but not nearly enough to satisfy financial markets or younger voters who will bear the burden in decades ahead. Still their limited reforms put to shame the political gridlock in Washington as it heads toward a “fiscal cliff” by year’s end.

Rhode Island’s pension reform stands out, not only for being comprehensive – moving state workers toward 401(k)-style retirement accounts and raising the retirement age to 67 – but in how it was achieved. “In this day when so many people have lost their faith in government,” said Raimondo, a former venture capitalist with a Yale law degree, “I like to think that we showed the way.”

Tackling fiscal challenges isn’t only an economic issue. It also restores faith in democracy, and not just for those who live in one but for those wondering if they want to live in one.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.