India blackout flips a switch

A two-day blackout for half of India was caused in large part by a massive theft of electricity. Many countries have yet to break the link between wholesale corruption and the stealing of power. Such widespread dishonesty can slow a country's growth.

Mary Knox Merrill /The Christian Science Monitor
A maze of telephone, electrical, and cable wires runs across a street in Delhi.

For two days this week, nearly 700 million people in India – or about a tenth of humanity – were left in the dark. When electricity was fully restored Wednesday, the country’s power minister declared one big reason for the blackout: “Everyone overdraws from the grid.”

He was being kind.

Theft of electricity is so pervasive in India that 15 to 30 percent of power is lost to illegal hookups, bill fraud, or nonpayment. Grid regulators face unexpected spikes in voltage if they can’t control the distribution of electricity.

The World Bank estimates that stealing from the grid reduces India’s gross domestic product by 1.5 percent. Worst of all, few investors want to put money into building new power utilities with so many juice pirates. That leaves India with little hope of lifting its poor by expanding access to electricity.

India’s blackout was a morality play for all the world to see. Dishonesty on a mass scale, especially when it is condoned with a wink by officials, can hurt any country.

India is only the most recent example of this.

In Greece, official lies about government overspending triggered the euro crisis in 2009, pushing much of Europe into a recession. Argentina’s leaders lie about the inflation rate – even to the point of punishing analysts who tell the truth – resulting in a slow economy. In the United States, some critics claim the massive lawlessness of 11 million illegal immigrants only contributes to a lax respect for the rule of law.

What’s the solution in such cases? For India and its power theft, the World Bank recommends this first step: “Acknowledge the theft.”

Indeed, exposing wrongdoing is essential to ending it. Some states in India have raised the penalty for power theft. Many are trying other reforms. One obvious solution is the use of high-tech sealed meters that deter theft or prevent collusion with utility workers on the take.

Power theft is usually associated with high levels of corruption. Thus it is common – and growing – in many parts of South Asia, Africa, Latin America, and former Soviet states, according to experts.

The US is not immune. The Arizona Public Service Company did a study in 2000 and found about 15,000 electric meters had been tampered with, costing nearly $5 million a year. The US industry estimates a yearly loss of 1 to 3 percent to power theft.

One study in India’s most populous state, Andhra Pradesh, discovered that losses in electricity were 3 percent higher during election years. Politicians were winning votes by allowing power theft. And in years when no known criminal was running for office, the utility’s revenues rose 5 percent.

In 1999, power theft in Bangladesh was so bad that the government deployed 35,000 soldiers to recover debts and curb the stealing. Brazil, which also suffers from high power theft, has mandated the use of 60 million “smart meters” by 2020.

Graft and power theft often go hand in hand, resulting in electricity outages. The blackout may finally spur India to deal seriously with widespread corruption – not only with officials but with everyday electricity users. When so many people experience the darkness, that can flip a switch.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.