Readers write: Thoughts from readers on columnist Ruth Walker

Letters to the editor for the Nov. 20, 2017 weekly magazine.

John Nordell/The Christian Science Monitor/File

Following Ruth Walker’s passing, I wanted to pass on a sincere appreciation for a woman who made my day almost every time I read her “Verbal Energy” column. In fact, truth to tell, it was usually the first thing I turned to when my Monitor Weekly arrived. (No offense, all you serious reporters and bureau chiefs – I got to you eventually.) But Ruth had such a way with words (fancy that!) that she just brightened my day and often sent me into peals of laughter. 

So many of her columns addressed knotty linguistic and grammar questions I’d wondered about but was too lazy to research, so she was eloquently practical to me, too. As word wonks go, Ruth was flat-out brilliant. I just wish I hadn’t procrastinated about telling her so and expressing my gratitude. Besides, I still have a lot of unanswered questions. 

I will miss her. Thank you, Ruth!

Gay Hanlon

Los Angeles

Ruth Walker’s “Verbal Energy” was my favorite column. I would not let myself read it till the very end. 

I shall miss Ruth and her column very much. I, too, love the history of words. It is hard to believe Ruth has stopped writing. Thank you for running the column so long.

Jewel Rimmer

Saint-Lambert, Quebec

My heart sank when I read about Ruth Walker’s passing, and with it the end of the publication of her lovely, witty, educational, and enriching “Verbal Energy” column. Very often I found myself first turning to the last page of The Christian Science Monitor Weekly to read this delightful piece.

Even though I read every page of the Monitor Weekly, and enjoy every bit of its contents, I know I will miss Ruth’s column immensely.

I wish I had sent her at least one thank-you note to tell her how much her columns helped to enhance my appreciation of English and other languages.

Hendrik J. Monkhorst

Gainesville, Fla.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Readers write: Thoughts from readers on columnist Ruth Walker
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today