Readers write: Election results, justice as model

Letters to the editor for the Nov. 28, 2016 weekly magazine.

Evan Vucci/AP
President-elect Donald Trump speaks during a rally in New York on Nov. 9, 2016.

Election results

Why did voters rebel and reject both the Democratic establishment candidate and all of the Republican establishment candidates? Because neither group of existing representatives has addressed the most pressing concerns of the majority in the United States: the people who are still suffering from the recession, who have seen their wages and standard of living stagnate or drop, their infrastructure suffer, and extreme polarization take hold.

President-elect Donald Trump won with a coalition of supporters and protest voters who simply want a wholesale change from business as usual. People want a functional government. One executive leader may not be able to accomplish that goal, but leaders throughout the US could unite around this goal and accomplish a turnaround for our beloved country if they will recognize that honest, fair, inclusive (rather than divisive) governing is what the majority of Americans want.

Jerry McIntire

Viroqua, Wis.

Justice as model

As a Montanan, I found the Oct. 22 online article “Should Montana justice be impeached for sentencing on incest case?” ( interesting. Judge John McKeon’s decision to impose a sentence of only 60 days to a man who raped his daughter is troubling, but I don’t have enough information to judge. The offender, the judge, and the situation are all unique and deserve due consideration. 

I do know that tying a judge’s hands is not the answer. Mandatory minimum sentencing is a major reason that more than 2 million people are behind bars. Those who break the law need to be confined, but the future is more important than the past. Justice should model the kind of behavior we want to see in our population, and mass incarceration doesn’t do that. The Sentencing Reform Act and the Recidivism Risk Reduction Act take important steps toward a more humane and moral system. There is still time to pass these bipartisan bills this year. Let’s try.

Jasmine Krotkov

Neihart, Mont.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Readers write: Election results, justice as model
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today