Readers write: Trade solutions, US economy

Letters to the editor for the Oct. 10, 2016 weekly magazine.

|
Ted S. Warren/AP
Ying Chau places a completed piece of luggage into a plastic bag at the C.C. Filson Co. manufacturing facility, in Seattle.

Trade solutions

Regarding the Aug. 8 cover story, “The truth about US manufacturing”: The United States has a $500 billion annual trade deficit primarily because of the loss of manufacturing. Every dollar spent in manufacturing generates an additional $1.08 of business. Thus the loss of manufacturing jobs has an oversized effect on total jobs.

If we had balanced trade deals, we would have avoided the 20 percent drop in wages for those without a high school education, the 10 percent drop in wages for those with a high school education, and flatline wages for those without a college education. The Clinton, Bush, and Obama administration trade deals were made for the benefit of parts of the business community and the well-to-do and to reach foreign-policy goals by which we paid off countries for other favors by giving them US jobs.

There are three solutions: tariffs, renegotiating trade deals, and certificates. Tariffs have rewarded those with friends in Congress, which decides what industries to favor, while trade deals are driven by short-term foreign-policy objectives. Trade certificates are an ideal proposed by Warren Buffett; each exporter gets a certificate for each dollar of export. Importers have to buy certificates from exporters where there will be a high price for certificates if there is a large trade deficit. It’s a free market strategy to force a balance in trade.

Charles Forsberg 

Lexington, Mass.

US economy

Regarding the June 21 blog post that ran on CSMonitor.com, “Will US productivity stagnate or flourish? Maybe neither.”: The article states that “US productivity performance has been utterly dismal ... [in] an eight-year rut.” The US economy is building a permanent state of stagnation by adding entitlements from debt instead of taxes. Immigrants are coming to the United States for entitlement instead of jobs. To build a sustained economic recovery, we need to control our debt and secure our borders.

Robert Shaw

DeLand, Fla.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Readers write: Trade solutions, US economy
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Readers-Respond/2016/1008/Readers-write-Trade-solutions-US-economy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe