Readers Write: Grading teachers isn't enough; Teachers deserve useful evaluation and support.

Letters for the Editor for the September 24 weekly print issue: When done with teacher buy-in, multiple measures, and meaningful professional development, teacher evaluation benefits entires school systems. Should teachers be graded? Yes. And so should parents, administrators, school boards, communities, and students. Evaluation shouldn't begin and end with teachers.

How to measure teachers – and schools

The Aug. 13 cover story, "The measure of a teacher," reminds us that too often the dialogue on teacher evaluation focuses on its potential for harm, rather than the benefits that good systems, infused with teacher buy-in, can bring.

High-quality evaluation and support systems ensure that our best teachers receive the recognition and further development they deserve and need, while weaker teachers have the opportunity and resources to improve. Accountability, however, must go both ways. As teachers are accountable to school leaders, our leaders must be accountable to teachers. Administrators must create fair and supportive evaluation systems that empower teachers.

First, systems must include multiple measures of teacher effectiveness, incorporating student achievement, observations, and input from students. Second, evaluations must be administered fairly. Schools must continuously improve how they measure and calculate success; all measures must be reliable and valid. Observations, in particular, require training and careful planning to be administered fairly.

Finally, schools must give teachers access to professional development that is meaningful and aligned with the evaluation system. That means trading in the quick workshops for intensive coaching and programs proven to improve the classroom interactions that matter most.

Virginia Vitiello

Research and evaluation director at Teachstone

Charlottesville, Va.

I am often disappointed when grading our schools begins and ends with the teaching staff. Should teachers be graded? Absolutely. However, why stop with teachers? Shouldn't we also grade administrators? Remembering that the school and classroom are merely an extension of the family and community, shouldn't these also be graded? How about the school committees and the caliber and purpose of those serving on them? Shouldn't the curriculum and texts be graded also?

And what about the impact class size has on the time a teacher is able to give to each student? Are all youngsters equally, innately capable of understanding the materials? Do students arrive in the class ready to learn? Does the ethnic makeup of a community affect students' valuation of education?

W.E. Gatchell Jr.

Retired high school math teacher

Enfield, Conn.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Readers Write: Grading teachers isn't enough; Teachers deserve useful evaluation and support.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Readers-Respond/2012/0924/Readers-Write-Grading-teachers-isn-t-enough-Teachers-deserve-useful-evaluation-and-support.
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe