Skip to footer

Readers Write: Congress ignores calls for tax reform; Political families teach service

Letters to the Editor for the weekly print issue of May 14, 2012: The responsibility for long-term fixes to the tax code rests with the US Congress, but the code has increased by 13,564 over the past eight years. Political families aren't un-American dynasties; they're examples of service.

Congress ignored calls for tax reform

The April 16 cover story, "The IRS code talker," initially instilled great hope for a much needed simplification of our federal income tax code, since the National Taxpayer Advocate, Nina Olson, was described in the following terms:

1. "She has been a consistent crusader in particular for simplifying the federal tax code...."

2. "Perhaps Olson's most basic message over the years has been the need for tax simplification."

Upon reading the article further, however, I learned that Ms. Olson has held this job for 11 years, and that during this time the number of pages contained in the US tax code has not decreased, but has increased dramatically (by 13,564 pages in just the past eight years).

The responsibility for long-term fixes to the tax code rests with the US Congress, before which Olson regularly testifies. Apparently, for the past 11 years, Congress has effectively ignored the "most basic message" of Olson and her staff of 2,000.

Although not intended, this cover story makes the prospect of meaningful income tax reform appear very bleak indeed.

Joseph M. Hall

Issaquah, Wash.

Political families teach service

In his April 16 commentary, "Kennedy and Bush families are never far from politics," Walter Rodgers makes some good points about political families. But I think he missed the fact that family background is an entry point to politics that can also work well – at all levels of government.

Examples abound of children following their parents into elected positions at the federal, state, city, and local level. When I briefly lived in the county seat of a rural county in Ohio (pop. 500), I met a young secretary at the hospital where I worked who was only in her early 20s but had already been elected the town clerk, following in the footsteps of other members of her family.

This is a time-honored way of entering public service, and I have to think that learning how to "serve" from one's own family is a good thing for this country.

Not all family traditions are bad.

Robert Mohrman

Portland, Ore.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Readers Write: Congress ignores calls for tax reform; Political families teach service
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Readers-Respond/2012/0514/Readers-Write-Congress-ignores-calls-for-tax-reform-Political-families-teach-service
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe