3 takeaways from Obama's speech on Syria

President Obama’s address to the nation on Syria last night was an exercise in nuance (if you approve of his speech), mixed messaging (if you are neutral), or mixed-up messaging (if you are critical). Mr. Obama acknowledged the reluctance of a war-weary public, but made an impassioned case for targeted strikes against Syria and laid out evidence of the Assad regime’s culpability in the recent chemical weapons attack.

But Obama also praised recent diplomatic developments: Bashar al-Assad’s offer to hand over his chemical weapons to the international community, with backing from Russia. And so, Obama explained, he has asked the Senate to delay its vote on the authorization of military strikes in Syria while this diplomatic option is being pursued.

Here are three key takeaways from his address.

1. It won't shift public opinion

Evan Vucci/AP
President Obama addresses the nation in a live televised speech from the East Room of the White House, Sept. 10. Mr. Obama blended the threat of military action with the hope of a diplomatic solution as he works to strip Syria of its chemical weapons.

It is unlikely that Obama’s speech itself will cause a seismic shift in public opinion. Speeches seldom do. People react more to real-world events than to what politicians say about those events.

John J. Pitney Jr. is the Roy P. Crocker Professor of American Politics and coauthor of “After Hope and Change: the 2012 Elections and American Politics.”

1 of 3

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.