Five reasons the Arab Spring has not failed

So much for the Arab Spring. In Egypt, history appears to have completed a bloody full circle. The country is back to a “temporary” martial law that will probably last for years.

Given the breadth and depth of the fissures that run through Middle Eastern society, it is tempting to conclude that democracy is bound to fail there. Sooner or later, the pessimists now argue, the countries of the Arab Spring will revert to the old kind of harsh rule by “strongmen.”

Yet I am not quite so pessimistic as to expect a complete restoration of the old order. The Arab Spring may appear to have failed, but in five important respects the Arab world has been changed irrevocably.

1. Less tribalism

Youssef Boudlal/Reuters
Egypt's former president Hosni Mubarak is transported back to a military hospital after a court hearing in the southern suburb of Maadi, on the outskirts of Cairo, Aug. 25. Mr. Mubarak was released from prison Aug. 22 and an appeals court ordered a retrial for his 2012 sentence of life in prison for complicity in the killing of protesters during the 2011 revolt against him.

The institution of tribalism is not as strong and cohesive as it used to be. Individuals within a tribe or clan have developed other loyalties and can defy traditional forms of authority in ways that were unthinkable a generation ago. The combined factors of urbanization, young demographics, displaced peoples, and emigration will further erode tribal and clan loyalties.

1 of 5
of stories this month > Get unlimited stories
You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Unlimited digital access $11/month.

Get unlimited Monitor journalism.