Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP
Host of the Academy Awards ceremony, Seth MacFarlane, peforms during the Oscars at the Dolby Theatre on Feb. 24 in Los Angeles. Op-ed contributor Katherine Lanpher writes: 'The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences should take the heat for selecting this host and this kind of ceremony, but the industry should take the heat for too often excluding and poorly portraying women and people of color in its films.'

Seth MacFarlane's Oscar jokes were bad, but they're just part of a bigger problem

We can carp all we want about Seth MacFarlane’s arguably misogynstic, racist, and anti-Semitic language, but his Oscars ceremony was just business as usual. It was a reflection of the same forms of misogyny, racism, and lack of diversity that plague Hollywood and its films generally.

I’ve absorbed all the reports and reviews of the Oscars, but I can’t help myself: I have a fantasy about host Seth MacFarlane.

It does not involve any part of my anatomy.

Jane Fonda was on stage Sunday night to present the award for best director, but in my rewrite of the Oscars, she turns to Mr. MacFarlane and whacks him with the latest report from the Women’s Media Center, which Ms. Fonda founded with Gloria Steinem and Robin Morgan.

Their annual survey on the status of women in media gathers statistics both depressing and uplifting. On Sunday morning political chat shows, for instance, women still only make up about 14 percent of those interviewed. On the other hand, the number of women who are television news directors rose to nearly 30 percent. Nearly at the tipping point there, gals!

The 2013 report came out on Friday, little noticed in the noisy hubbub leading up to the Academy Awards ceremony on Sunday. I wish Kristin Chenowith had been handed that report before ABC gave her the microphone for her red carpet interviews.

Imagine how her interview with, say, Jennifer Garner, could have gone. Instead of asking what designer she was wearing (Gucci), Ms. Chenowith might have asked: “Did you know that even though women account for 51 percent of the movie-going audience, we accounted for only 33 percent of all characters in top-grossing films?’’

And instead of asking Hugh Jackman if she weighed more than an Oscar, Chenowith might have informed him that since 1950 male film characters have outnumbered females 2:1, but that women were more likely to have sexually explicit scenes.

Hugh, after all, is far more likely to hum something from “Les Miz” than to sing the juvenile ditty “We saw your boobs!” – the title of MacFarlane’s opening number on Oscar night.

And then there’s the study that shows girls as young as six are beginning to think of themselves as sex objects. Don’t know where they would get that idea once a nine-year-old is told on national television how many years she needs before she’s too old to date George Clooney – MacFarlane’s reference to nine-year-old Quvenzhané Wallis, the youngest Best Actress nominee for her role in “Beasts of the Southern Wild.”

We can carp all we want about Seth MacFarlane’s arguably misogynstic, racist, and anti-Semitic language, but his Oscars ceremony was just business as usual. It was a reflection of the same forms of misogyny, racism, and lack of diversity that plague Hollywood and its films in general. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences should take the heat for selecting this host and this kind of ceremony, but the industry should take the heat for too often excluding and poorly portraying women and people of color in its films.

ABC promoted Sunday’s awards ceremony as a bro-show: “Finally, An Oscars the guys can enjoy!” But you have to wonder which “guys” are ok with a joking inference to an alleged rape at a Hollywood home or about the ability of Latina and Latino actors to speak clearly. I wouldn’t insult the men in my life like that.

True, the ceremony pulled 11 percent higher ratings than the ones most recently before it, including in that all-important demographic of viewers ages 18 to 49. But people also slow down to look at a car accident.

It’s an interesting juxtaposition, the words and numbers involved with how Hollywood portrays and treats women and minorities. Language that belittles or objectifies comes as little surprise considering how few women or people of color have strong, leading roles. For instance, consider these statistics from a 2012 survey of the Academy by the Los Angeles Times: 94 percent of members are Caucasian, 77 percent are male, and the median age is 62. About 2 percent are African-American, and less than 2 percent are Latino.

The only way to fight the so-called jokes we saw on Sunday night, the only way to change the words of Hollywood, is to change the numbers. Seth MacFarlane has said he won’t be hosting the Oscars again, but the Academy should still think about its future. If they call Jane’s people, I’m sure she can get the Academy a copy of the 2013 Women’s Media Center report. 

Katherine Lanpher is a senior seminar leader at The OpEd Project and a freelance journalist in New York.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Seth MacFarlane's Oscar jokes were bad, but they're just part of a bigger problem
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2013/0227/Seth-MacFarlane-s-Oscar-jokes-were-bad-but-they-re-just-part-of-a-bigger-problem
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe