Jason Reed/Reuters/File
Chelsea Clinton (L) greets Princess Ameerah al-Taweel of Saudi Arabia at the Clinton Global Initiative conference in New York, September 25, 2012. Op-ed contributor Qanta A. Ahmed writes that Princess Ameerah is 'in an ideal position to build on' a solid foundation of well-educated Saudi women and launch them 'into the socially networked sphere of citizen journalism, micro-blogging, and self-publishing.'

How a princess can help Saudi women find their voice

It's time for Saudi women to beat conservative clerics at their own game by publishing op-eds, using Twitter, and blogging. I know just the woman to help them get started: Princess Ameerah al-Taweel. She should champion a successful US model, The OpEd Project.

For Saudi women, the shortest route from the back seat to the driver’s seat is looking them in the face: the opinion section of a media outlet. Saudi women, among the most suppressed in the world, must discover that public voice is public power.

Certainly, Saudi women are challenging the status quo – whether protesting the ban on driving or lobbying for their right to practice law. Indeed, last week 30 Saudi women were appointed to the kingdom’s Shura Council, the first official political positions for women in the country’s history. But it is the kingdom’s religious clerics who have corralled the forms of opinion-making – staking their claim in traditional and social media.

Their views are widely heard, reinforcing the country’s harsh sharia law which mandates segregation of the sexes in public and particularly punitive restrictions on women and girls, who may not work, travel, marry, or do much else without the permission of a male guardian.

It’s high time Saudi women give the clerics a run for their riyal. They can do that by following an American media example set by Katie Orenstein, the visionary founder of The OpEd Project. Her organization seeks to increase the number of women thought-leaders in many fields who can exercise their public voice on a wide spectrum of issues, often through the “op-ed” – the journalism term for opinion pieces such as this one.

I can attest to the influence of op-eds: After publishing my former experiences as a doctor in Saudi Arabia in op-eds, I’ve been invited to address UN delegates before a panel this March to speak about Saudi women and their human rights.

Through The OpEd Project, print and broadcast journalists and, eventually, alumni of the project, mentor women and minority opinion-shapers so they can get their views heard. In six short years, op-eds by women in leading US commentary outlets have increased by 40 percent, with Ms. Orenstein's project leading the way. The Op-Ed Project is planning its first international venture, in Norway. Let’s hope Saudi women are next.

I know just the Saudi woman who can champion such a project: Princess Ameerah al-Taweel. This young, stylish, determined woman is vice chairwoman of the Alwaleed Bin Talal Foundation – named for her prince husband – which promotes education philanthropy and interfaith dialogue.

Her royal highness has assumed the mantle of change for women with a passion. In interviews with CNN, Forbes, and at the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City, she said that the new generation of Saudi women not only wants to drive, they also want to contribute fully to their country. She even speaks of the power of the op-ed as a way for women to coordinate their efforts – just as the clerics do.

She advises "evolution, not revolution,” but at a much faster pace than in the past. Hers is a savvy and pragmatic approach to present-day Saudi Arabia, where 60 percent of the population is under 30 but conservative clerics are entrenched.

Change so far has been glacially slow, though King Abdullah has pushed harder for women in recent years than any other previous ruler. In 2009, he allowed women and men to share classes at a university, and granted women the right to run in municipal elections in 2015.

Princess Ameerah recognizes that opposition to women’s reforms is based in tradition and culture, but more specifically in the powerful lobby of the conservative Saudi religious establishment. The clerics repulse efforts toward liberal reforms even when instituted by the monarch himself.

Their power comes from royal patronage and state-sanctioned “official” Islam, including religious police. But their enhanced influence of today stems from the media, especially social networks.

The clerics rapidly fill columns on opinion pages as the princess pointed out in a September interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour. They also mobilize the population through Twitter feeds. In contrast to their Luddite image, radical clerics were among the early adopters of social media in Saudi Arabia. Their tweets go out by the millions, many of them against women, including warning against sending Saudi women athletes to the Olympics. That particular effort thankfully failed, and the kingdom’s first judo athlete competed in London last summer, as well as a track athlete who holds dual US-Saudi citizenship.

Clerics or not, the number of Twitter users in Saudi Arabia is exploding. Saudis are the fastest growing group on the social networking site, with usage rising 3,000 percent in just one month last year, according to Twitter chief executive Dick Costolo.

Saudi women can beat the clerics at their own game. Among Muslim women, Saudis are some of the most educated, with mandatory education until the age of 16 ensuring high rates of literacy. The majority of university graduates in Saudi Arabia are women (58 percent), though women account for only 15 percent of the workforce.

Princess Ameerah and her organization are in an ideal position to build on this solid literate foundation and launch Saudi women into the socially networked sphere of citizen journalism, micro-blogging, and self-publishing.

The battle for women’s advancement – waged across broadsheets and twitter feeds – will be long and slow, but worthy, and ultimately won. It is unlikely to resemble the incendiary masses that the world has grown accustomed to in the two years since the Arab Spring exploded across TV, phone, and computer screens.

Instead, change in Saudi Arabia will demand a small cabal of influential, articulate “opinionistas” – willing and persuasive voices who publish and publish often. Only when The OpEd Project comes to Riyadh, Jeddah, Dammam, and Mecca, will Saudi women be heard in their own authentic voices.

[Editors note: The original version incorrectly identified Princess Ameerah al-Taweel's husband.]

Qanta A. Ahmed, an alumna of The Op-Ed Project, is the author of In the Land of Invisible Women,” detailing her life in Saudi Arabia. She is associate professor of medicine at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. Follow Dr. Ahmed on Facebook, Twitter (@MissDiagnosis), and her Huffington Post blog.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How a princess can help Saudi women find their voice
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today