J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Rep. Gwen Moore (D) of Wisconsin recounts being sexually assaulted during her childhood and then raped as a young woman as she and other Democrats in the House push for the unrestricted reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act on Capitol Hill May 16. Op-ed contributor Sherry Hamby says, 'The House should join the Senate in passing a version [of the Violence Against Women Act] that will lead to better protection of American Indian women and girls.'

Pass a Violence Against Women Act that protects American Indian women

Eighty-six percent of the perpetrators of sexual offenses against American Indian women are non-Indian, but tribal police have no authority to detain them. The House must pass a reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act that includes key protections for American Indian women.

Violence against women is a distressingly common problem in all segments of US society, but American Indian women and girls are particularly vulnerable to sexual and domestic violence. Data show that a shocking 1 in 3 American Indian women have been raped in their lifetime – twice the national average. The rate of domestic violence victimization is even higher, with more than 2 out of 5 American Indian women experiencing violence at the hands of a husband or boyfriend.

The National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence, which is the largest US survey devoted to the victimization experiences of children and youth, shows that this vulnerability even extends to American Indian girls. The survey, which is conducted by David Finkelhor, Heather Turner, and myself, found that 1 in 10 American Indian girls have been raped in our sample of youth, which includes 17-year-olds and younger. This is nine times the average for other American girls. We also found that 2 out of 5 American Indian girls have witnessed domestic violence between their parents – a rate that is 2 1/2 times higher than the US average for other girls.

Such high rates of violence are a call to action. The Senate has passed a version of the re-authorization of the Violence Against Women Act that includes legal reforms that are an important first step toward helping American Indian victims of sexual and family violence. The House of Representatives version was stripped of the provisions to enhance support for American Indian victims. The House needs to agree to pass the Senate version or add these key provisions back when both houses meet in conference to reconcile the two versions.

One striking way that sexual violence against American Indian women is different is that almost all of the perpetrators are non-Indian. Eighty-six percent of the perpetrators of sexual offenses against American Indian women are non-Indian, according to Bureau of Justice Statistics data from the US Department of Justice. This differs sharply from patterns for other US ethnic groups.

For example, according to the same data, only 27 percent of white female victims have nonwhite perpetrators, and only 17 percent of African-American rape victims are assaulted by non-African-American men. This might be largely a statistical curiosity if it were not for the different legal standards in force on reservation land. The federal government restricts the ability of tribal police to arrest or even detain a non-Indian perpetrator of any crime. Even a non-Indian who lives full-time on a reservation and is married to an American Indian woman cannot be arrested by tribal police.

Currently, the only way that a non-Indian who commits domestic or sexual violence on land under tribal jurisdiction can be prosecuted is through the federal court system. But US attorneys offices are not set up to handle local crime and simply do not have the manpower to manage all of the cases. Further, even if they do take a case, by the time they respond, often from offices located hours away from the scene of the crime, the trail is cold and physical evidence is hard to obtain.

Perhaps because of these reasons, data from 2005 to 2009 indicate that US attorneys offices declined 67 percent of sexual offense cases involving American Indian women victims. The Senate version of the new Violence Against Women Act will start to close this legal loophole by giving tribal courts the power to prosecute non-Indians who perpetrate domestic or dating violence and who violate protection orders on tribal land through concurrent, joint jurisdiction with federal courts.

The version that the House passed does not include these new protections for American Indian women. Legal reform will only be one piece to the solution for better protecting American Indian women and girls from sexual and family violence. Other steps, like better access to emergency health care, will also be important to the solution. Increasing respect for the rights and safety of women and girls everywhere is also needed. These legal reforms embodied in the Senate version of of the act are a first step in that direction. The House should join the Senate in passing a version that will lead to better protection of American Indian women and girls.

Sherry Hamby is a research associate professor in psychology at Sewanee, the University of the South and editor of the journal Psychology of Violence.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Pass a Violence Against Women Act that protects American Indian women
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today