Canada as international peacekeeper, US unilateral approach to North Korea may be a 'viable new alternative,' 'Righteous outrage' doesn't produce social change, To tackle terrorism, Saudi Arabia and Iran must resolve rivalry

A roundup of global commentary for the April 17, 2017, weekly magazine.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press/AP
Canada Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shakes hands with UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres at the United Nations on April 6, 2017.

Toronto Star / Toronto 

Canada as international peacekeeper 

"A government so eager to get back into peacekeeping, to have Canada 'step up' and assume its responsibilities as a committed member of the United Nations, now hesitates at the water’s edge," states an editorial. "There are plenty of understandable reasons for this. The international landscape has changed dramatically with the election of Donald Trump. UN missions in Africa are dangerous and difficult.... Taking time to get it right makes sense. But Canada’s drawn-out hesitation waltz carries its own risks, and they are undermining the very purpose of the government’s original intent.... Better to deliver on a more modest commitment than to make ambitious declarations and then balk at actually carrying them out." 

The Korea Times / Seoul, South Korea 

US unilateral approach to North Korea may be a 'viable new alternative' 

"Donald Trump’s warning that he would deal with North Korea 'with or without China’s help' may in fact have a chance to succeed...," writes Lee Seong-hyon. "Solving the North Korean conundrum with the US initiative would mean sustained American leadership and enlarging U.S. interests in the region.... The obvious aim is to gradually spread 'capitalist elements' within the North Korea and expose its population to outside information. This obvious Trojan trick will be obviously noticed by the North Korean authorities but the economic incentives are something they themselves desire as human beings.... The real aim is to change North Koreans’ mindset and induce a peaceful implosion. If it is done peacefully, even China won’t mind it."

The Guardian / London

'Righteous outrage' doesn't produce social change 

"We lefties have impeccable pedigree when it comes to righteous outrage...," writes Sonia Sodha. "[T]here’s something life-affirming and motivating about asserting your membership of a tribe with common values. But it also carries something of a guilty pleasure: the smug satisfaction of earning your virtue-signalling stripes in our social media age. This particular guilty pleasure brings risks.... Once it spills over from the social media bubble into radio phone-ins and breakfast TV, there is a danger that righteous outrage, far from winning people over to our world view, merely entrenches the ways of thinking that leftists find anathema. Changing people’s minds is a non-negotiable part of achieving social change." 

The News International / Karachi, Pakistan 

To tackle terrorism, Saudi Arabia and Iran must resolve rivalry 

"Even though a lot has been written on the issue of terrorism, overcoming the menace continues to elude everyone...," writes Fawad Chaudhry. "We cannot do anything to overcome extremism since our clerics have failed to create a consensus on the extremist interpretations of Islam.... What we and other Muslim countries can and should do is to bring Saudi Arabia and Iran to the negotiating table. The rivalry between the two states is dangerously intense. Failure to bring the two nations together would mean critical failure in overcoming the international dimension of conflicts that give rise to terrorism. If we cannot resolve this dimension, we cannot combat the threat of terrorism as a whole." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.