A ‘Blueprint’ for better politics

Dr. Nicholas Christakis’ research suggests that humans are hard-wired with a “social suite” including love and teaching – an innate desire to connect.

Courtesy of Human Nature Lab
In his book “Blueprint,” Yale professor Nicholas Christakis writes that love, friendship, and cooperation are hard-wired in humans.

If Thomas Jefferson or James Madison were nation building today, what would they be reading? America’s success is built in no small part on its founders’ insight into human nature. In the 18th century, that meant study of Enlightenment philosophers such as Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Locke. Nowadays, it might mean sharing a conversation with Nicholas Christakis.

Professor Christakis runs the Human Nature Lab at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, and his recent book, “Blueprint: The Evolutionary Origins of a Good Society,” feels like a modern-day Enlightenment treatise. With scientific methods and tools that were scarcely imaginable three centuries ago, he runs humanity through the wringer and comes to a conclusion that might surprise some people: “The arc of our evolutionary history is long. But it bends toward goodness.”

So as part of my effort to acquaint you all with fellow readers and thinkers working to expand the best in our natures, I sat down with him in December for a chat and turned the conversation to politics.

Dr. Christakis’ research suggests that a “social suite” including love, friendship, cooperation, and teaching has been hard-wired into human beings, though we tend to deploy these qualities selectively toward those like ourselves – our “in group.” In many ways, he says, America is an unprecedented social experiment, testing whether we humans can share these behaviors more broadly.

In that, America has had an important superpower. It has had identities that cut across in-groups. For example, “you might go to a different church from someone else, but you had connections with them” – your children played baseball together or you went to the same school or had the same occupation, Dr. Christakis says. And the less segregated we are – not just racially but by ideology, religion, income, and education – “the stronger the democracy.”

That’s changed in recent decades. People talk about living in “Facebook bubbles” where we only interact with people who agree with us, but it goes beyond social media. We live in an increasingly “sorted” society. Yet for a diverse democracy to overcome the urge to tribalize, it needs citizens with crosscutting identities, he says.

So what do we do now? We can combat tribal tendencies in one of two ways, Dr. Christakis says. We can “go up, or go down.”

We can go “up” to a higher unifying identity as fellow citizens, for example. While most nation-states define themselves by ethnic or linguistic identity, “it’s almost unparalleled in the history of the world that anyone can become an American,” he says.

Or we can go “down” a level and acknowledge the innate value of each individual, as Martin Luther King Jr. argued. “Every single human holds prejudiced opinions,” Dr. Christakis says. But that can be overcome by “our innate capacities for recognizing the uniqueness of others and for forming friendships.”

In the end, the founders got it right. The Constitution reflects crucial features of human nature, Dr. Christakis says. Political tides can push against our innate desire for the good in the social suite, “but only for a while.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A ‘Blueprint’ for better politics
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today