Finding faith's common core

Coexistence is more than a bumper sticker. It is a vital need in a world with 7.1 billion different ways of seeing things.


You’ve seen the bumper sticker: the cross, the crescent moon, the Star of David, and other symbols spelling out “Coexist.” Nice design. Excellent message. It could be tweaked to include even more belief systems and perhaps more shades of thoughtful unbelief as well. Coexistence, after all, is about acceptance, an acknowledgment that the world is bigger than one faith and one tradition. Argument and force will never change 7 billion hearts.

Not that humans haven’t tried. But after centuries of religious war, persecution, discrimination, and condemnation, it is fairly clear that no single belief system is going to prevail. Different faiths – and even the faith of no faith – must coexist because people will always be different and faith is always arrived at in different ways. How can anyone dictate what all those curious hearts – different between brother and sister, different from Monday to Tuesday, different between nation and nation – believe? How can the meaning and purpose of life be bottled under one brand name?

Faith, after all, is not supposed to wag its finger. It is supposed to be the unseen force that enriches, elevates, unites. Often it does. But faiths still also divide and demean. That has been a known drawback of religion since the dawn of time, which is why prophets, mystics, and religious reformers for just as long have attempted to locate a common core in the hopes of eliminating denominational conflict.

The core is there – the conscience, the I am, the universal Soul – yet denominations endure. Denominations provide comfort and community. They claim the true path and demand loyalty. Most are fierce about self-preservation. They are not about to be eliminated. Tolerance and empathy are not unusual, however. They are more like the norm. Enlightened leaders have practiced coexistence at least since Ashoka the Great in the 3rd century BC. Coexistence, in fact, is the steady state among people of different religions except during spasms of intolerance – inquisitions, jihads, pogroms, ethnic cleansing – which usually have less to do with belief than with the will to exert power.

In modern times, the interfaith movement is working to find common ground in the essentials of love, peace, and justice. There is also a more intimate interfaith movement under way. In a Monitor cover story (click here), Stephanie Hanes looks at the growing number of mixed marriages. These are not just temporary expedients that will ultimately be resolved by the dominance of one religion. Increasingly, husbands and wives are seeking a deeper, generic set of values that can resist family pressure and the tug of tradition but still quench their thirst for meaning.

If there is a time of year when coexistence shines, it is now, in the season of gratitude and giving. We can be grateful to a deity of whatever name or just be grateful for life, love, family, friendship. When we are gathered around a Thanksgiving table – whether drawn together by blood, belief, companionship, or neighborliness – we are the living, breathing, talking, joking, dining embodiment of coexistence.

John Yemma is editor-at-large of the Monitor. He can be reached at

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Finding faith's common core
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today