Angela Merkel’s true superpower: Pragmatism.

Angela Merkel's brilliance has roots in a German-style pragmatism. She was always in the middle, but that doesn’t mean she was always a moderate. 

Francois Lenoir/Reuters/File
German Chancellor Angela Merkel attends a meeting at the European Commission headquarters in Brussels, Oct. 25, 2015.

In more than 20 years traveling as a Monitor correspondent, I have come to one conclusion: Every place on Earth has a lesson to share. 

Whether it’s the Amazon basin or the back alleys of Delhi, everywhere has taught me something. In the kaleidoscope of humanity are answers to so many of our questions, if only we have the humility and curiosity to look.

Reading this week’s Monitor, I’m reminded of one of the more emphatic lessons I have learned during this time: Problem-solving is often only as hard as you choose to make it. Germany taught me that lesson. And as evidence, I appeal to Lenora Chu’s cover story about German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who is stepping down after 15 years in power. 

What was Chancellor Merkel’s secret to such a long and successful political career? She was a problem solver amid crisis after crisis. Now, one could simply argue that was her superpower and leave it at that. But that would miss the lesson Germany is offering the world. Chancellor Merkel was not some extraordinary figure deserving her own line of Marvel films. Her brilliance has far humbler roots grounded in a distinctly German pragmatism.

In speaking about how Chancellor Merkel did what she did, Lenora lays out the unremarkable truth: She was always in the middle. This doesn’t mean she was always a moderate. Her decisions to end nuclear power and accept 1 million refugees were radical by some standards, not to mention against her party’s orthodoxy. But in her decisions, she was eminently pragmatic. She “always had an impeccable sense for where voters are to be found across a broad spectrum,” one source says. Another says she perfected “German superpragmatism.” 

Perhaps the greatest casualty of hyperpolarized thought is problem-solving. Solutions are not products of calcified thought. Nor do they know anything about party lines or personal opinions. But they do require pragmatism, and they usually emerge somewhere near the center – at the nexus of intellectual push and pull that yields a collective way forward. A society that yields to polarization is a society that has prioritized personal opinion over problem-solving.

Chancellor Merkel, by all accounts, simply wanted to find practical answers, which meant “she’s the last one standing, when all the other heads of state were ready to go back to their hotel rooms,” one political scientist says. Where did she spend her effort? On trying to get things done.

Some of that is just who she was, Lenora writes. Some of it was her background as a scientist. But a lot of it is simply because she is German. Her repeated reelections show a country that rewarded and valued pragmatism over politics. The result was a nation steady at the helm of Europe, comparatively spared from the political turmoil in other parts of the West. And in that is a lesson. When we are ready to put problem-solving above politics, Chancellor Merkel has given the world a useful model close at hand. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Give us your feedback

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

 

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.