When doors closed, communities opened

Through this past year of pandemic-driven isolation, one thing has become clear: It’s not the locale that makes the community; it’s the people.

|
Mahmoud Khattab/INA Photo Agency/Sipa USA/AP
A muezzin calls Muslims to prayer from an otherwise empty mosque in Deir El-Balah in the central Gaza Strip, on Jan. 8, 2021.

What does it mean to belong to a community? 

There are, of course, many answers to that question. Some communities cohere around common activities, others around mutual values. But until very recently, most communities had one thing in common: They all hinged on some kind of shared physical space. A neighborhood. An office. A school. A ball field. A church. 

Through this past year of pandemic-driven distance and isolation, one thing has become increasingly clear: It’s not the locale that makes the community; it’s the people.

At its root, that’s what this week’s cover story is about. As governments and organizations restricted in-person gatherings last spring, many congregants worried what that would mean for the sense of fellowship that stems from gathering in a single location to worship together. Some religious communities railed against the restrictions, pointing to the freedom to practice religion enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. 

Many churches learned that locking the doors didn’t have to mean pulling up the welcome mat. By pivoting to virtual programming, religious leaders were able to not only engage their congregations, but also grow their ranks. In some cases, that meant former parishioners who had moved away could rejoin a loved community. In others, it meant a chance to bring new people into the fold, regardless of where they live.

Our story focuses on Christian churches, but other religious communities have discovered unexpected benefits in making space for virtual gatherings. 

When the annual pilgrimage to Mecca was restricted last summer, virtual offerings suddenly made participation possible for Muslims who could not afford or otherwise manage to travel to Saudi Arabia. Similarly, in Jewish communities, virtual shiva enabled a broader range of friends and family to join together in the traditional rituals of mourning.

Virtual communities aren’t entirely new. People have been convening online in chat rooms and digital forums since the 1990s. But for the bulk of society, a clear dividing line separated the digital world from what many consider real life. The pandemic changed all that.

As the world retreated from public spaces, people flocked online to try to replace what they missed most about communal life. It was always meant to be a temporary measure, a placeholder until our regular lives could resume in full. 

But something unexpected happened along the way. People began to realize that some of these stopgap measures are actually useful. 

Grandparents who may not have felt particularly digitally savvy braved Zoom and FaceTime to read bedtime stories to their grandchildren. Teachers opened up new avenues of communication with families that could make it much easier for working parents to check in during the semester. Universities and cultural institutions opened their virtual doors to people around the world who might never have been able to visit in person.

The irony is that this global crisis that isolated us all has also helped us to see new ways to connect with each other.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to When doors closed, communities opened
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/From-the-Editors/2021/0209/When-doors-closed-communities-opened
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe