The triumph of gray

Perhaps the answer to growing concerns about capitalism is not in black or white – it is in the perpetual reconsideration and recalibration that reveals the symphony within the gray.

Mark Lennihan/AP/File
American flags fly in front of the New York Stock Exchange.

Extremes can certainly be alluring. For many years, I had at my desk a classic “Calvin and Hobbes” comic strip in which Calvin laments: “The more you know, the harder it is to take decisive action. Once you become informed, you start seeing complexities and shades of gray. You realize that nothing is as clear and simple as it first appears. Ultimately, knowledge is paralyzing.” Then the punchline: Throwing a book over his shoulder, he says, “Being a man of action, I can’t afford to take that risk.”

Today, there’s the temptation to be “a man of action” like Calvin. Social media goad us, as do political parties and our own desire to turn the murky shades of gray into black and white – something easier to assimilate. But the cover story this week by Mark Trumbull and Eoin O’Carroll is a wonderful example of the need – even the triumph – of loving the gray.

Their story looks at growing concerns about capitalism, particularly among the young. These young people see abundance but don’t think it’s being distributed fairly. In short, the upper and upper-middle classes are hoarding it.

Is the answer socialism? Some think so. That, after all, is the other extreme. If the concern is that wealth is being unfairly hoarded, then more enforced sharing seems a logical response. But Mark and Eoin’s story also makes clear that capitalism has created unprecedented wealth in recent centuries by unleashing the individual. Free markets create the conditions for individuals to be rewarded for their innovation and hard work. Economies that lack that incentive have lacked the dynamism essential for growth.

Perhaps the answer is not in black or white – it is in the perpetual reconsideration and recalibration that reveals the symphony within the gray. True, our ideals must be in black and white. Our bedrock is fairness and compassion and responsibility and honesty, for instance. But in the thousand million collisions of these ideals among different peoples, traditions, needs, and nations, the genius is in finding the notes that blend them most harmoniously – the road that moves us closest.

What’s interesting is that the greatest potential for free market capitalism lies in the potential inherent in every single person. In that way, the goal is both individual and collective. Individuals have ideas. The collective needs them. The stronger the individual, the better the ideas. The stronger the collective, the bigger the market. Done right, free market capitalism is a powerful virtuous cycle.

Doing it right requires some regulation to ensure opportunity is spread as widely as possible, but not so much that it chills individual innovation. How does that symphony of gray look? In their book “Our Towns,” James and Deborah Fallows offer a glimpse. In smaller towns, where a strong sense of community means everyone is an “us,” companies and the wealthy often act differently. From Holland, Mich., to Columbus, Miss., they invest in local schools and art and health. They spread wealth naturally and without compulsion. The answer to the challenges of capitalism, then, might simply be wrestling with how we can best expand the concentric circles of “us.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.