Coaching humans out of static thinking

Science is one of the most reliable ways to coach humans out of narrow, static thinking and into mental channels that grow and challenge our views of – well, everything.

Courtesy of Christine Floss/NASA
Members of the antarctic search for meteorites collect a carbonaceous chondrite meteorite near Mt. Ward in Antarctica.

Why do we care about asteroids? Or Pluto? Or methane seas on a Saturn moon? It is a question that besets space science. Amid all the needs here on Earth, who really cares if a rock from Mars’ Meridiani Planum shows that liquid water once flowed there?

In her cover story this week about asteroid research, staff writer Eva Botkin-Kowacki starts by offering her answer to this enduring question: Asteroids matter because – hello, remember the dinosaurs? Mass extinction tends to grab the attention. Mountaineer George Mallory gave us the somewhat prosaic “because it’s there” explanation of exploration, while US President John Kennedy attempted something a little more poetic.

“We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people...,” he said in 1962 of his plans for a moonshot. “We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard; because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills....”

All true. Yet the essence of all science – and space science in particular – is hard to define precisely because science does more than study rocks and calculate launch trajectories. It fuels the expansion of thought. Put another way, science is one of the most reliable ways to coach humans out of narrow, static thinking and into mental channels that grow and challenge our views of – well, everything.

Just because this cannot be measured with calipers or on a balance sheet does not diminish its inestimable value to the world.

When science led Albert Einstein and Max Planck to the conclusions that would become general relativity and quantum mechanics, human thought entered realms previously unknown. These fields are no less a voyage of exploration than those of Magellan or da Gama. But rather than opening a new territory, they have opened new mental vistas. As the understanding of what reality is stretched and expanded, scientists were forced to become more elastic and free in their thinking. Expanding our understanding of the universe has literally expanded the boundaries of thought.

Speaking of a mission to an asteroid, one scientist in Eva’s story says: “I don’t even want to predict what we’re going to find. The only thing I can guarantee is we will be surprised.”

Those findings might not reshape thought with the force of E=mc². But they will be one more peck at the shell of limited understanding. Even if it’s only in a small degree, they will broaden humankind’s mental vista.

Expansion has ruled and ordered the material universe since the big bang. It is the defining trait of successful economies. When we apply the right principles, the result is that knowledge, freedom, wealth, and health all expand naturally. In whatever form the quest to expand understanding and possibility takes – even, perhaps, an asteroid hunt – it is inextricable from human progress.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.