Another revolution in Lexington

You might see something like this in any middle school across the US or beyond. Yet hidden in its seemingly unoffensive positivism is something altogether more radical.

MARK SAPPENFIELD/THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
ENTRANCE HALL BULLETIN BOARD AT DIAMOND MIDDLE SCHOOL IN LEXINGTON, MASS.

This column is about the photograph above. So I’ll twiddle my thumbs for a moment while you look at it. It appears in the entrance hall of Diamond Middle School in Lexington, Mass., where my children attend some weekend classes.

The bulletin board is, in many ways, unremarkable. You might see something like this in any middle school across the US or beyond. Yet hidden in its seemingly unoffensive positivism is something altogether more radical.

For the students of Diamond Middle School, this bulletin board is more than just wall space. On the wall next to it are attached handwritten testimonials of how someone in the school exemplified these qualities. One girl “was mindful of several other people and let them speak before her,” one student wrote. Another girl “helped translate and comfort one of the exchange students from China who was upset/homesick while visiting our school,” a different student wrote. A boy “sat with me at lunch when I was sad and alone,” a third student wrote.

To a random parent walking the halls of Diamond Middle School, the message is clear: These are our superheroes. These are the people who make our community special.

And then you wonder: Is this a lesson just for middle-schoolers? Is there a place where demonstrating these qualities no longer makes sense? Are there people who do not deserve to be treated this way? In other words, is this practical for the “real world”?

Much of the news of today would persuade us to answer “no” to that last question. At a recent Monitor event, a professor at a liberal arts college here in New England told me, essentially, that what we might call the “Diamond Middle School” approach was naive to the point of moral dereliction. He was a liberal. But I’ve heard conservatives say the same thing. The times seemingly demand strong stands and hard lines.

Yet, to me, what sets the Monitor apart is that it seeks to ground its strong stands on those values and ideals, and not for person, party, or policy. It stands for the notion that the values we are all taught in middle school are not bromides simply to get us to stop fidgeting at our desks, but the glue of any society and the fuel of any progress. Bullying and bad behavior happen at all stages of life, and the way to defeat them never changes.

The Founders of the United States recognized that theirs was a nation built on ideals, and they crafted a constitution specifically to protect them. Only then could the incomparable power of “we the people” be realized.

Their lesson remains. Without common ideals, there is no basis for that “we.” And the expression of those ideals is not the province of any political party. The ideals are the “we” that defines us much more deeply, expressed in honesty, humility, kindness, responsibility, bravery – to name a few. 

The first shots of a revolution were fired from Lexington’s Battle Green in 1775. Today, perhaps, they are being fired from a middle school bulletin board just down the street.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.