Listening to centrists -- and to the fringe

To defend and expand the 'vital center' of society, it is important to understand what the extremes are saying and doing.

ANDRES KUDACKI/AP
A WOMAN SHOUTED SLOGANS DURING A PODEMOS (WE CAN) PARTY MARCH IN MADRID JAN. 31.

The word of the day – arguably the word of our still young century – is “extremism.” On all sides, mainstream society is being challenged by groups that beg to differ with the prevailing order and want to overturn it quickly and, if necessary, violently. Muslim extremists have shocked the world with their graphic violence. Ultranationalists are a worrisome force in Russia. And as a cover story by Monitor Europe correspondent Sara Miller Llana details, extremists on both the left and right are growing more vocal and attracting more followers in Europe.

 
Meanwhile, in the United States ... well, this is where talking about extremism gets tricky. The farther away from a situation you are, the easier it is to use the term. Extremism is a word centrists use. Centrism tries to be reasonable, to see all points of view and strike a balance. Centrism is usually the best policy, but not always. It is a belief in the status quo, and there are times when the status quo must be challenged. Abolition, women’s suffrage, civil rights, environmentalism, and a hundred other causes that become mainstream began at the fringes.

You and I likely consider today’s extremists alarming. Historian Arthur Schlesinger, writing at a time when communism seemed on the march as some extremist movements today seem to be, argued in his book “The Vital Center” that centrism is the “group which [holds] society together” by defending civil liberties, the rule of law, and the democratic determination of political and economic policies. Without the center, civilization falls apart.

Still, the extremes cannot be ignored. In Europe, their voices represent growing concern about economic hardship on the left and the preservation of European culture on the right. It is too easy to dismiss them as socialists or xenophobes. Even if their views don’t predominate, they are at least a warning that the center is not currently including everyone. When the center is healthy, it incorporates the best ideas and best people from the extremes, and civilization moves on.

* * *

On March 1, just days after Islamic State vandals destroyed priceless objects in a museum in Mosul, Iraq, the country reopened its national museum in Baghdad. In the fall of 1990, as storm clouds gathered for the first Gulf War, I visited an earlier version of the National Museum of Iraq. I was one of the only guests that day, probably all that week. The guides gave me a private tour of the human-headed winged lions and other priceless treasures, delighted to show a Westerner around.

Iraq has been mismanaged and manhandled by extremists – despots like Saddam Hussein and death cults like Islamic State – for far too much of its rich history. More than anything, it needs a vital center. Its national museum is one part of that. It is an ark that carries some of the earliest relics of Western civilization. It is a living rebuke to today’s most intolerant extremists. They may be smashing things. They may be barking at us, but our 10,000-year-old caravan moves on.

John Yemma can be reached at yemma@csmonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.