Oil, gas, and the Saudi factor

Saudi Arabia's oil wealth gives it enormous influence in the world. Decisions made in Riyadh are felt from Moscow to North Dakota, Venezuela to Iran. 

FAHAD SHADEE/REUTERS/FILE
SAUDIS SHOP AT HAYAT MALL IN RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA.

Saudi Arabia is only 82 years old. It has a population the size of Nepal’s; it is short on water and arable land, but rich enough to have superhighways, shopping malls, imported delicacies from around the world, and pricey desalination plants that make the desert bloom. It also has enormous global influence.

You can trace a dotted line from the kingdom to almost every current news headline. There’s a Saudi factor involved in conflicts in the Middle East, South Asia, and Africa; in Russian adventurism; climate concerns; the global economy; the future of alternative energy.

The Ur deal that founding father Abdelaziz Ibn Saud struck with Wahhabi clerics in exchange for their help in consolidating his family’s rule ensured the dominance of that strict interpretation of Islam. Then came oil. Six years after the country’s creation, the largest source of crude in the world was discovered at Dammam. The House of Saud became immeasurably rich and influential.

On the surface, wealth dampened tribal rivalries and gave the kingdom every modern convenience, but petrodollars also have funded the propagation of Wahhabism, which, directly or indirectly, has given rise to the Taliban, Al Qaeda, Islamic State, and other jihadist movements. Wahhabism might have won hearts and minds anyway as Muslims encountered it during the hajj, but oil money supercharged it.

In a Monitor cover story (click here), David Unger examines the reasons behind, and the implications of, the current drop in oil prices. Saudi Arabia is the key actor in this, having decided to continue producing well above what the world is consuming. If you are filling up your car, you’re glad. For Americans, the nearly $1 per gallon decrease since spring is the equivalent of a tax cut. China, Japan, the European Union, and other energy importers are being handed an economic stimulus package. But oil producers – including those who have recently made the United States a net energy exporter via hydraulic fracturing – are worried. So are Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Nigeria, and every other country that relies excessively on oil revenue and may face social unrest as economic hardship sets in.

By keeping output high and forcing prices lower, the Saudis are conducting a global economic experiment. Their aim is to protect market share. As David reports, however, it is not clear whether the Saudis control the energy market as they once did. Conservation and alternatives were aspirational in the 1970s when Jimmy Carter called the energy crisis the “moral equivalent of war.” Today, alternatives are practical choices for car buyers, homeowners, businesses, and communities because of technological advances, plummeting costs, and concern about carbon emissions.

This is a fascinating moment. Saudi Arabia is using the hydrocarbon treasure uncovered in the 20th century to ensure its place in the 21st. That won’t happen quickly. It will almost certainly require a sustained period of overproduction, which means a sustained period of low oil prices – with all that that implies. That dotted line will run from the kingdom to almost every news headline you will read in the months ahead.

John Yemma is the Monitor's editor-at-large. He can be reached at yemma@csmonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.