Why walls rise -- and must fall

Some walls are necessary, but before building any wall it is important to understand what is being walled in and what is being walled out.

Melanie Stetson Freeman/Staff/File
Berlin Wall, 1986

We build walls for many reasons – to proclaim ownership, to provide privacy, to ensure safety. Also out of fear and spite. Walls keep others out and keep us in.

Twenty-five years ago next month, a great wall fell in Berlin. For decades, the Berlin Wall had been the symbol and centerpiece of the Iron Curtain, which stretched from “Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic,” in Winston Churchill’s famed words. By the late 1980s, the communist system that built that barrier was in tatters. The world-changing Soviet leader of that time, Mikhail Gorbachev, had winked his approval to Eastern European reformers. Hungary had opened its borders to allow East Germans to go west. West German embassies in Prague and other capitals were flooded with eager escapees. Mass demonstrations erupted in Leipzig and East Berlin.

On Nov. 9, 1989, the world gasped in astonishment. We were all Berliners that day, all feeling a collective thrill as easterners and westerners pounded the wall with hammers and crowbars, embraced one another, and celebrated in a days-long rave along the once deadly strip known as no man’s land. The concrete monstrosity tumbled. History’s tectonic plates shifted. The quarter century since that epochal event has seen the birth and growth of a new Europe – with all the achievements, missteps, hopes, and disagreements that freedom always brings.

By contrast, the Near East of 1989 was moving in the other direction. Fear was growing; hope receding. From the late 1960s to the late ’80s, relations between Palestinians and Israelis, while never free from tension, had been relatively relaxed. In the souks and shops and public spaces of the two regions, both peoples mingled, made deals, shared cups of tea. Some struck up friendships. Some fell in love.

That changed as militancy and violence overcame both sides in what became known as the first intifada. Barriers went up, first makeshift then permanent. Common space vanished. As you can see on the map on page 29 that accompanies a Christa Case Bryant cover story (click here), a great wall now stretches from the slopes of Mt. Hermon to the Gulf of Aqaba.

Sometimes separating people is a practical necessity. Greeks and Turks on Cyprus, Serbs and Kosovars in the Balkans, Pakistanis and Indians in the subcontinent – all have such deep differences that, for now, they are better off apart than together. Divorce is no one’s first choice, but it is sometimes the only practical one.

But walls are not permanent solutions. Robert Frost’s best point about them wasn’t that they make good neighbors (they can but not always), nor that they are unloved and often breached. It is that before building a wall it is wise to ask what is being walled in and walled out. 

Fortress Israel has walled in Israelis in relative safety. After almost three decades of violence, that is somewhat understandable. But it has walled out the people they will always share that land with. Someday, hope will conquer fear. Someday – not now but eventually – that wall, too, must fall.

John Yemma is the Monitor's editor-at-large. He can be reached at yemma@csmonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.