Could the 2010 Celtics beat the 1986 Celtics?

Imagine a series that featured Pierce, Garnett, and Allen against Bird, McHale, and Parish.

Gary W. Green/Orlando Sentinel/MCT
The 2010 Boston Celtics, shown in action against the Orlando Magic May 26, have been a model of balanced scoring – but how well would they fare against the 1986 Celtics?

They failed to put away the Orlando Magic last night, but the Boston Celtics have been playing exceptionally well during the 2010 playoffs. Led by long-armed and quick-footed point guard Rajon Rondo, they have epitomized balanced scoring and egoless team play.

But how well would they fare in a fantasy seven-game series against the 1986 Celtics, generally considered one of the best NBA teams ever?

Not well.

The team stats are painfully lopsided:

The 1985-86 team won 67 games, losing just one at home. They averaged 114.1 points per game during the regular season, while allowing 104.7.

The 2009-10 team won just 50 games, averaging 99.2 points per game and allowing 95.6.

The player matchups are more interesting, but the 1986 team still comes out on top:

Point guardDennis Johnson vs. Rajon Rondo. Advantage? Tie. Rondo is quicker and dishes out more assists, but "D.J." was a brilliant defensive stopper and scorer.

Shooting guardDanny Ainge vs. Ray Allen. Advantage? Allen. Both were gifted long-range shooters, but Allen is a cut above.

Small forward – Larry Bird vs. Paul Pierce. Advantage? Bird. Both are clutch performers who won NBA three-point contests. But there's a good reason Bird won three straight MVP awards.

Power forwardKevin McHale vs. Kevin Garnett. Advantage? McHale, but just barely. Garnett is the superior athlete and a fierce competitor, but McHale was a better rebounder and scorer.

Center Robert Parish vs. Kendrick Perkins. Advantage? Parish. Perkins is an underrated center, but "The Chief" had more tools in his belt.

Oh, and the 1986 team had Bill Walton – coming off the bench. 'Nuf said.

Finally, the style of play favors the 1986 team.

In the 1980s, NBA teams moved the ball around the perimeter quickly, looking for players to come off screens and cut to the basket. This pattern led to a lot of mid-range shots and lay-ups – and high scores.

Today's NBA teams have lapsed into a different offensive formula: pick and roll up high, penetrate the lane, then kick out for a three-point shot. No wonder scoring has dropped.

At their best, the 2010 Celtics have defied this pattern, moving the ball crisply around the arc like the 1986 squad. But in a seven-game series, there's nothing like the real thing.

Fantasy result: 1986 beats 2010, four games to two.

of stories this month > Get unlimited stories
You've read  of 5 free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Only $1 for your first month.

Get unlimited Monitor journalism.