Overcoming self-righteousness through love

A Christian Science perspective: On humility that brings healing.

Do you ever stop to think that Bible stories from thousands of years ago have cutting-edge relevance when it comes to today’s issues – those close to home or across the globe? The story of Naaman in the Old Testament (see II Kings 5:1-14) often reverberates for me, especially when I’m holding views I’m not so ready to give up.

As captain of his army, Naaman helped win deliverance for his people. Yet when he was faced with what was described as a loathsome physical disease, the battle was of a different sort. Told by the prophet Elisha to do something that seemed demeaning for a heralded captain of an army to do – wash in the Jordan River seven times – he rejected this order in anger.

Naaman’s servants, however, encouraged him to take a second look, to humble himself and follow Elisha’s God-impelled directions. Naaman did, and had an instantaneous healing. Naaman went far beyond listening to servants – he gave up pride, ego, and self-justification, and responded to what we would understand today to be the light of the Christ. Mary Baker Eddy, who founded Christian Science, defines Christ as “the divine message from God to men speaking to the human consciousness” (“Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures,” p. 332).

In order to help Naaman gain a sense of humility, his servants had asked him, “If the prophet had bid thee do some great thing, wouldest thou not have done it? how much rather then, when he saith to thee, Wash, and be clean?” (II Kings 5:13). When we’re asked to do some high and noble thing, we’re often happy to respond. But when asked – or required – to take humbler steps, shouldn’t each one of us yearn to feel a deep sense of willingness?

Some years back, during a family vacation, my brother and I discussed several controversial subjects. We had some decidedly differing views. He criticized my position in strong terms, and we parted in anger.

Deeply hurt by his comments, I went for a long drive and considered our conversation. I prayed for God, infinite Mind, to guide me. It wasn’t long before I detected some hardened self-righteousness in my thinking, and, like Naaman, I felt humbled and repentant.

Upon returning to the cabin, I apologized to my brother for refusing to be open and inclusive, for shutting the door on his views. Our relationship was healed at that moment. We have open and honest conversations, and haven’t had another argument since that time over 17 years ago.

This doesn’t mean every strongly held thought I had disappeared in that moment. But what I came to see so clearly as I prayed is that wherever my human opinions land, there is a far greater directive at work – the charge to love our fellow man (see Matthew 22:39). Whether we’re confronted with disagreements at the dinner table or in an interchange at work, we can embrace this idea in Science and Health: “Love for God and man is the true incentive in both healing and teaching” (p. 454). When nurtured and treasured, this love for God and man raises us to a higher sense of spiritual vision and expression.

If we are frozen by a sense of self-righteousness, our ability to grow spiritually and to love others will be stymied. Christ Jesus explained it this way: “Whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted” (Matthew 23:12). Mrs. Eddy speaks of God’s tender action in rebuking and reversing hardheartedness in this verse from her poem, “ ‘Feed My Sheep,’ ” (“Poems,” p. 14):

Thou wilt bind the stubborn will,
Wound the callous breast,
Make self-righteousness be still,
Break earth’s stupid rest.

Many heartfelt points of view accompany religion and politics in our world today. As we embrace humility and drop self-righteousness, we become able to express more consistently a genuine, spiritual love for God and our fellow man.

This article was adapted from an article in the Sept. 5, 2016, issue of the Christian Science Sentinel.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.