Artificial versus real intelligence

A Christian Science perspective.

I remember once sitting in front of a computer as a systems engineer, trying to find a bug in a software program. It had tens of thousands of lines of code, and I’d looked in every part of the code where I thought there might be a problem but found nothing. My delivery deadline was approaching, and I really had no idea where to turn next.

When I find myself in a situation like that, whether it’s about software or something else, I often turn to these Bible verses: “Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths” (Proverbs 3:5, 6).

So I acknowledged God as the true source of all intelligence – as the divine Mind who knows all. I acknowledged God as my Mind, and myself as God’s child, as the direct, uninterrupted expression of that infinite Mind with unlimited capacity to know and do what is necessary to bring clarity and order to any situation.

The Bible also says, “Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 2:5). That’s what I was striving to do: to rely on Christ – divine Mind’s impartation of itself to humanity – to inform my actions, as Jesus did.

Suddenly, the name of a particular computer file came to thought. I’d already looked in this file without success, but I reopened it. Again I saw no problem, but something in the file made me think of another file that seemed to have nothing to do with the problem. Because I was now leaning on divine direction instead of “my own understanding,” I concluded it would be wise to follow this leading of divine Mind. I opened the second file and saw very quickly the offending code: a semicolon was missing in one line. I inserted it, and a test confirmed that the problem was fixed.

That’s what I call relying on real intelligence. The field of “artificial intelligence” seeks to simulate human intelligence through computer technology. Much of what I’ve read about artificial intelligence bases its conclusions on the premise that man is a biological machine and that human consciousness is a glorified computer.

Experiences like the one I just shared illustrate to me a less limiting premise: that true intelligence is based in Spirit, or God, and that human consciousness imbued with the Christ-spirit is free to act from the basis of infinitude. As Monitor founder Mary Baker Eddy wrote, “The human mind, imbued with this spiritual understanding, becomes more elastic, is capable of greater endurance, escapes somewhat from itself, and requires less repose” (“Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures,” p. 128). Spirit has no biological or physical component and, therefore, no physical limitation. Neither does Spirit’s offspring.

Whenever I hear about advances in artificial intelligence, I am deeply interested in the ideas that have led to these technological breakthroughs. And I have taken advantage of some of those breakthroughs myself. At the same time, I reflect on the many awe-inspiring insights I’ve had turning repeatedly to Spirit as the source of true intelligence, and I realize anew the infinitude and omnipotence of divine Mind, encompassing all. Anything less is indeed artificial.

For a Danish translation of this article, see The Herald of Christian Science.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.