Women lag men in retirement savings, but they have one big advantage

Because women are more likely to take time off of work or work part-time, saving for retirement can be more difficult. However, women are more likely to enter fields with more stable retirement plans.

Adam Robison/Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal/AP/File
A teacher makes origami paper cranes wit her students.

When it comes to retirement savings, women lag behind men. According to a new report by the National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS), retired women aged 65 and older are 80 percent more likely to be impoverished than their male counterparts. Retired women aged 75 or older are three times more likely than men to be in poverty. Because women are more likely to take time off of work or work part-time, saving for retirement can be more difficult, especially when factoring in compound interest, where it pays to be an early saver.

Women also are less likely than men to participate in a retirement savings plan. According to the Department of Labor, 63 million women in the US are working for wages or a salary between the ages of 21 and 64. Only 44 percent of those participate in a retirement savings plan.

The low savings rate among working women can be attributed in part to the ways they are participating differently than men in the workforce. Women are more likely to work part-time, which may exclude them from eligibility in retirement plans.

Additionally, women are more likely to make emergency withdrawals from 401(k) savings, notes Virginia Maguire, director of retirement products and solutions at Aon Hewitt, a risk management firm. “Women, in some cases, are hit repeatedly throughout their career or dinged throughout their career in saving for retirement," she tells the Washington Post. "They start at a lower salary scale. To save the same percentage (as men) would be a smaller dollar amount a month. Often women take a break in service, so they have a smaller (retirement) balance.”

There's some good news, however. Certain fields women are more likely to enter, such as education, health services, or public administration, are more likely to have defined retirement plans. According to NIRS, women lead men in working for employers with outlined retirement programs for employees. Though women who who work in those fields aren't likely to have high salaries, they are also less likely to fall into poverty as they get older.

Of women who retired from a career in education, for example, only four percent aged 65 or older are considered poor, according to NIRS. For those women who worked in public administration, five percent are below the poverty line in their later years, compared with seven percent of health services workers and nine percent of retail workers.

The NIRS suggests that women begin saving right away, either through an employer’s 401(k) savings plan or through an individual retirement account (IRA), like MyRA. Also, Jennifer Brown, manager of research at the NIRS, told USAToday, that she suggests taking advantage of savings rewards, like the federal Saver’s Credit for low or moderate income individuals. This program provides a tax credit for those who contribute to a retirement savings account.

In order to close the retirement savings gap between women and men, Aon Hewitt recommends that companies offer tools to help women save, such as healthcare, financial management, and debt management education. Employers can also encourage professional advice for investments and add features to companies’ 401(k) savings plan that help workers save more aggressively.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.