Wealth gap between the rich and the middle class is now the widest on record

The wealth gap between upper and middle income US families is now at its widest point in at least 30 years, according to a Pew study released Wednesday. Rich Americans have begun to regain the wealth lost during the Great Recession, while lower and middle income families lag behind. 

Jim Young/Reuters/File
A protestor marches through the streets as others hold a banner during a demonstration in Chicago in 2012. The wealth gap between upper income Americans and everyone else has become the biggest on record, according to a Pew Research Center report released Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2014.

As study after study has shown, the US economic recovery has been a top-heavy affair, with the bulk of the wealth regained from the Great Recession benefitting the wealthiest Americans.

The latest comes from a report released Wednesday by the Pew Research Center, which found that the wealth gap between high income Americans and middle income Americans is now the biggest on record. “In 2013, the median wealth of the nation’s upper-income families ($639,400) was nearly seven times the median wealth of middle-income families ($96,500), the widest wealth gap seen in 30 years when the Federal Reserve began collecting these data,” The Pew report reads.

Additionally, the net worth of America’s high-income families is nearly 70 times that of lower income families.

Using Federal Reserve data, Pew divided US families into lower, middle, and upper income, with adjustment for family size. A middle-income family of four, for example, made at least $42,000 in 2013 – 46 percent of families fall into this category. An upper-income family of four (21 percent of families) made $132,000.

Wealth, which Pew defines as “the difference between the value of a family’s assets (such as financial assets as well as home, car and businesses) and debts,” is different from income (the amount of money a family brings in in a given year), another measure of widening inequality that has come under scrutiny in recent years. The two are related, and wages and income have certainly stalled as the rest of the economy picks up steam.

Wealth, however, is a deeper measure of financial well-being, taking into account reserves that a family might be able to fall back on in the event emergencies, like layoffs, and live off during retirement. In the wake of the Recession, higher income families have managed to regain some or all of the wealth they’ve lost, while middle and lower income families remain behind.

That growing disparity has  a lot to do with the nature of the recovery over the past six years or so. The stock market has long erased all of the losses it suffered after the 2008 crash, and the wealthiest Americans tend to have a larger proportion of their money tied up in such investments.

Middle class Americans, on the other hand, have more wealth tied up in their homes – compared to the investment sector, and the housing collapse decimated such wealth for many. In comparison to the stock market rally, the housing recovery has been relatively weak. 

“Upper-income families have begun to regain some of the wealth they lost during the Great Recession, while middle-income families haven’t seen any gains,” Pew concluded.

The wealth gap may have been exacerbated by the recovery, but it was growing long before.  In the 30 years since the Federal Reserve started keeping track, the richest Americans have nearly doubled their nest eggs. Middle income Americans have grown theirs by just 2.3 percent.  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.