WFAA.com has a good story on the economic impact of mega events in Texas that is largely based upon a paper written by TSE’s own Dennis Coates and Craig Depken. Read the whole thing, like they say, but I want to focus on one secti0n of the article.
As you no doubt know, the staff here at TSE are not big fans of those economic impact statements commissioned by those seeking public subsidies for sports. This is because the research of (independent) economists looking at the historical record find, time and again, that the claims made by the (paid) consultants in the impact statements are overblown.
The author of the article asked an official of the Texas comptroller’s office, the office charged with giving out the subsidy dollars, why his office doesn’t bother to see if the claims of the impact statements held up.
Then it’s up to (Robert – PM) Wood’s office (Texas Comptroller’s office – PM) to decide — based on the consultant’s study — how much money the state will donate.
No one has ever been turned down.
After the final whistle has blown, the comptroller does not check to see if the event generated the tax money the consultant said it would. “We don’t have the resources to check,” Wood said.
Perhaps if a subsidy request were denied, then there would be some resources available. But when you’re using other people’s money on other people….
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.