Use it until it breaks? The pros and cons.

At first glance, it makes good frugal sense to continue to use an item until it is no longer functional. But waiting to replace something until it breaks could mean having to buy something at a less than ideal time. 

Desmond Boyland/Reuters/File
Men stand beside a broken down US.-made car on a street in Havana in October. In some cases, Hamm explains, waiting to replace an item until it is no longer usable could mean having to make an ill-timed purchase.

Jerry writes in:

I was reading on another blog about replacing things that work with better versions of the same item like clothes hangers. To me, it makes more sense to just keep using something until it actually breaks, then replace it, but that’s just my sense of wanting to get every last drop out of something I put my money into. What do you think?"

Although Jerry didn’t mention the blog article he was referencing, I would guess that he was talking about “Does It Ever Make Sense To Replace Something That Is Functioning Properly?” over at One Frugal Girl.

Anyway, Jerry makes a valid point and asks a good question. At first glance, it makes good frugal sense to continue to use an item until it is no longer functional. Otherwise, as Jerry says, you’re not extracting the full value from that item. I am completely on board with using an item until it’s no longer usable.

The question, to me, really is about replacementI do not think that the best time to replace an item is when it is no longer functional. In that situation, you ideally need something to perform that task that is functional, which means that you have a pretty small timeframe to make a purchase.

Ideally, when you’re buying a new item, you’ll take advantage of two things.

First, you’ll have a research opportunity. You can spend at least a bit of time figuring out what the best version of the item is as well as perhaps the best “bang for the buck” version of the item is. You can figure out things like that from reading Consumer Reports or other reputable publications and asking around in your social network.

This is an opportunity to really figure out what it is that you’re buying and isolate it down to a few options that will really work and solve your problem.

Next, you can look for sales and discounts for those specific items. This can take time, but it’s well worth it, especially if you’re shopping for a pricier item. If you can shave $50 off of the cost of the item you’re buying, it’s well worth a few internet searches every few weeks for a while or checking out sales flyers.

The end result is that you wind up with a quality item that will last for a very reasonable price.

The problem is that this process takes time. Although you can do the research fairly quickly if necessary, it does take time to wait on a sale.

If you’re buying out of necessity, you can’t wait for a sale. You’ve pushed yourself into a situation where an immediate buy borders on necessary.

Thus, for me, I try hard to identify items that may fail in the fairly near future, but still have life left in them. Those are the items that I focus on for the buying process.

If a sale on the right item happens to come up before I need a new version of that item, I’ll still go ahead and pull the trigger. Then, I’ll take the new item and store it for a while until the old one fails. I’ve done this with blenders, umbrellas, and pots and pans, among other items.

This works even for inexpensive items, like clothes hangers. If you’re like me, you’ll eventually bend a wire hanger enough so that it doesn’t hold an article of clothing well or you’ll accidentally break a plastic one on occasion. Thus, if I ever notice that our hanger count seems to be getting low, I’ll just simply watch for a sale on them and add them to the mix.

Occasionally, I’m still pushed into situations where I have to make a quick replacement purchase, but I don’t like to be in that situation. A little bit of advance planning, as described above, can help you avoid it most of the time.

The post Use It Until It Breaks? appeared first on The Simple Dollar.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.