Are certificate of deposit interest rates worth it?

With CD interest rates barely above regular savings account averages, Trent Hamm cautions that certificate of deposit savings programs may not be worth the incentives. 

David Duprey/AP Photo/File
A clerk poses for a photo showing cash in the register at Vidler's 5 & 10 store in East Aurora, N.Y. Hamm compares the benefits and drawbacks of CD programs and regular savings accounts.

The savings account at your local bank probably earns around 0.5% interest right now. Even the best national banks at the moment earn only around 0.85% in interest.

By comparison, rates on CDs look pretty good. You can find five year CDs with rates around 1.80% if you search around.

A quick note for new readers: A CD is short for a “certificate of deposit,” which is essentially a special type of savings offered by a bank. It usually offers a better interest rate than a normal savings account, but you have to agree to not take your money out for a certain period of time – the term – or else you’re faced with a stiff penalty.

If you have $1,000 in the bank, 0.85% annual interest will leave you with $1,043.29 after five years, whereas a five-year CD at 1.8% will give you $1,093.30 after five years. That’s $50 more for every $1,000 you invest and they’re both equally stable. 

So… why not get a CD?

Right now, I have no money at all in CDs and I won’t for quite a while. I don’t feel that earning an extra fraction of a percent in interest is worth all the drawbacks. Here’s why.

First, I can’t withdraw the money if I need it without incurring a stiff penalty. CD policies vary, but usually it amounts to six or nine months of interest on the CD vanishing if I were to withdraw early.

So, if I were to need the money before that mark, I’d lose much of what I’d gained by using a CD. In fact, if I use the money before the six or nine month mark, I’d actually lose money overall because the fee would be greater than the interest I had earned.

The only way to get ahead with a CD is to literally not touch the money for years.

Second, you have to get a long term CD in order to have a rate that’s noticeably higher than savings accounts. One or two year CDs have interest rates that are only tiny fractions of a percent higher than a savings account.

Let’s say, for example, that I’m comparing a 0.5% savings account and a 0.75% one year CD. I have $1,000 to save. Over the course of that year – when I’m unable to touch that money – the CD is only earning me $2.50 more than the savings account.

Third, if I get a long-term CD right now, will I still be happy with earning only 1.5% or something in 2017? Probably not.

The rates on CDs and savings accounts are largely based on the federal funds rate, which is a number set by the Federal Reserve (when you hear about “the Fed” and changing rates on the news, this is what they’re usually talking about). Right now, that rate is at 0 to 0.25%, which is basically as low as it can be. Banks only offer a little more than that.

Seven or eight years ago, that rate was around 4% and we saw banks offering interest rates as high as 5% or 6% on savings and even as high as 7% or 8% on CDs.

There are some reasons to buy CDs if the gap between savings accounts and CDs gets high enough, such as CD laddering, but you’d want at least a 1% difference between your savings rate and your CD rate.

Aside from that, the only reason to ever buy a long-term CD is if it’s high enough that you’re going to be happy with the return in four or five years. Since, right now, rates have pretty much nowhere to go but up, if you buy a long term one now, you’re going to just regret it later. Even if everything goes perfect for you, you’ve just barely beaten a savings account and you’ve had to lock up your money for that period.

The post Lock In Your Savings? Don’t Do It appeared first on The Simple Dollar.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.