A nice house, or financial freedom?

Signing up for a big mortgage and the best house the bank will let you afford can be tempting, but having some additional square footage or a granite countertop isn't worth the loss of financial freedom. 

Gwyneth Roberts/The Journal Star/AP/File
Athree-bedroom, two-bathroom house for sale by the city in Lincoln, Neb. Hamm argues that more modest living conditions are a happy trade-off for more financial flexibility.

Anyone who’s been awake to watch the changes in the economy over the last five years is familiar with the burst of the housing bubble. Too many people were given mortgages that were bigger than their budgets could handle and when those people couldn’t pay, the banks that offered those mortgages were in serious trouble.

Virtually everyone who signed up for these troublesome mortgages was in a situation where it strained their budget to make the payments and when something changed, whether it was the adjustment of a mortgage rate or something else, they were unable to keep paying.

That situation is one that I heard a few times growing up: “house poor.” It referred to people who had a mortgage sitting over their head with monthly payments large enough that it was a monthly struggle to keep the bills paid. So much of their monthly income was sucked up by that mortgage that they had to live in near-poverty in other aspects of their life just to keep the house.

I can fully understand the desire to own a house of your own. I can also fully understand the desire of wanting the best house the bank will possibly allow you to get. I experienced both in 2007 as we shopped for a home of our own.

At the same time, “house poor” is not a place you want to be. Being “house poor” means a lack of freedom. 

When you sign up for a large mortgage, you’re essentially requiring yourself to maintain a certain level of income. If you can’t maintain that level of income, you’re going to be facing some very difficult decisions very fast – selling a house, drastically downsizing in a hurry, taking a brutal hit to your credit, and adding even more worry to your life.

You’re sacrificing the freedom to make many career choices, for example. You can’t take that lower paying job that’s exciting and perhaps gives you equity in a company or builds some amazing experience and references. You can’t walk out on a job that’s making you miserable without a secure job already in place. You can’t afford to do these things because that mortgage is hanging over your head.

You’re sacrificing the freedom of having spending money in your pocket. Your budget is now nice and tight, so you can’t just spend $20 or $40 on a spur-of-the-moment date. It doesn’t work like that any more.

These sacrifices also come with stress. You know you’re walking a tightrope now. You know you have more to lose if you make a mis-step.

To me, having some additional square footage or having a granite countertop or a showy living room isn’t worth the loss of freedom.

I would far rather control my own destiny in a lower-stress environment in exchange for having one or two fewer bedrooms and a bit smaller kitchen and maybe some elements that I can gradually repair or replace.

In that situation, I still have choice. I can choose to keep saving for the nicer home. I can choose to invest the money on hand into the house to make it nicer, both for myself and for resale value. I can choose to make a career switch if I want or jump to a different job if the career stress is too high. I can choose to go out once in a while with my wife and know that I’m not putting my budget in a precarious place.

When you’re faced with the decision about whether to buy an amazing house you can just barely afford or a less exciting house that you can easily afford, take your eyes off of the granite countertops for a moment and think about the freedom of choice in other aspects of your life.

Would you rather have career freedoms, lower stress, and many windows of opportunity? Or would you rather have that granite countertop and that unused extra bedroom?

For me, the choice is clear.

The post “House Poor” Versus Controlling Your Own Destiny appeared first on The Simple Dollar.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.