QE3: What happens now?

Q3 earnings will still matter for individual stocks, Brown predicts, but QE3 will not affect the major indexes.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke delivers remarks about a significant shift in the direction of U.S. monetary policy at the Federal Reserve in Washington September 13, 2012. Brown writes that QE3 looks like a game changer at first blush.

Now everything is different.  At first blush, QE3 does indeed look like a game changer.

This is business is not about making calls and sticking with them for the sake of being able to say you were right all along, it is about processing new information that will make a difference and dropping the opinions that have been invalidated.  I come to work every day hoping I'll be able to do that.  It's easier to write about than to actually do.  Is your decision making process flexible?  Are you hung up on what "should happen" rather than what is likely to happen?

I think the open-ended nature of this new bond buying program ($40 billion a month, unencumbered and without limit) demands that we acknowledge the new rules of the game:

Q3 earnings will still matter for individual stocks, as they always have, and misses will be punished.

And there will be plenty of misses and negative warnings, just like Q2.

But this will not affect the major averages, paradoxically.  They should be be able to weather this as they are driven by large companies with incoming dollar flows into their shares as a result of Bernanke flooding the market with dollars.

Worry less about the "E" for now and more about the "P" - QE3 does wonders for multiple expansion, especially as it makes bond holdings even more unpalatable than they already are - the money has to go somewhere.

The new question is not "bonds or stocks?"  It is "which kind of stocks?"  We prefer the bigger stocks with bond-like characteristics (lower vol, high rate of returning cash to shareholders).  Others will reach for garbage and buy cyclicals hoping for improvement from China. Maybe they will get it, the pain will be severe on an individual stock basis if they do not.

When in doubt, do something other than cash.

Dips can be bought. They will be gifts, specifically headline-driven stuff.  Because the Europeans are following the Fed now.  So long as China doesn't blow up between now and Christmas, we should have a lot less volatility than previously expected into year-end.

These are the new rules in my way of thinking, unless something changes - in which case my job is to reassess.  Again, much easier to write about than to actually be about.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to QE3: What happens now?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today