Morgan Stanley's turnaround
Morgan Stanley should be commended for their earnings in the first quarter, even at a loss, but investors should still beware of Morgan Stanley.
1. Bank of America and Morgan Stanley earnings are "good". There are some strange things going on with the DVA calculations and how they contribute/detract from the quarter, but this has been going on for months now and people on TV are talking about it so it is officially rendered a non-factor.
2. Morgan Stanley (and James Gorman) in particular are to be commended for what they've done balance sheet-wise. I still hate the stock, don't see why I'd want to be long it given the Dodd-Frank realities, low interest rates and the fact that any minute they're going to drop $10 billion on the rest of Smith Barney they don't already own. Doubling down on a melting iceberg.
3. Everyone just LOVES the American chemical stocks now. They are the primary beneficiary of low nat gas prices (one of their biggest import costs). The traders at my shop played DuPont ($DD), I didn't. I think this will be a short-lived love affair as low costs are offset by slack final demand in the end. Asian/European chemical companies are so screwed meanwhile - many of them are stuck with either crude oil or higher-priced local nat gas as their imputs.
5. If they get Qualcomm down closer to 60 I'll probably grab some. I'm long a small amount from the low 50's since 2010. I didn't see anything disappointing in the Q, guidance was cautious, not negative.
What are you thinking/seeing?
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here.To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on www.thereformedbroker.com.