In business, more money is not always a good thing

By taking large amounts of money from investors, you give up some control over your business. A better strategy is to only raise money when you truly need it.

Issei Kato/Reuters/File
A money changer shows some one-hundred U.S. dollar bills at an exchange booth in Tokyo in this file photo. Dr. Cornwall argues that raising too much money from investors can be a problem.

One of the biggest mistakes I made during my days as an entrepreneur was raising too much money.
Because our business was successful, we had investors eager to offer us money. But by taking money when we really did not need it, we found that it created more problems than benefits.

When taking money from outside investors, you give up part of the control over your business.

"One of the reasons most people start a company is so they don't have a boss," says Jake Jorgovan, co-founder of Rabbit Hole Creative, a high-tech graphics and marketing firm. "If you take out funding, then you have an investor looking over your shoulder at every decision you make."
Taking outside money can also lead to building overhead and creating an infrastructure that can lock you into a specific business model as you attempt to make good on the things you have committed to in your business plan.

Michael Brody-Waite, CEO of InQuickER LLC, prefers to keep his company lean and adaptable even though it has grown to annual revenue of seven figures.
"We chose to stay agile and not lock ourselves into a rigid trajectory unnecessarily," Brody-Waite says. "The cost of taking money in terms of distraction and complexity is well-documented. Our company is built on maintaining less mass, agility and out-simplifying our competition."
Too much funding can also propel a company into a level of growth for which it is not prepared.

"Bootstrapping your growth allows you to grow at a pace that is comfortable for you," Jorgovan says. "Investors will want to see rapid returns on investment regardless of what that means for you. When you bootstrap a company, you can build it into the company that you want to work in. You can build it into a business that you enjoy going to work at every day."

Like many entrepreneurs, both Jorgovan and Brody-Waite have felt the pressure to consider taking funding from investors. It seems to be part of the entrepreneurial culture, especially in businesses that have the potential for significant growth. There seems to be an expectation that seeking investment capital is a standard part of starting such a venture.

Although both businesses have seen successful growth through bootstrapping rather than fundraising, there may come a time when bringing investment money into each company makes sense.

"I expect us to take money eventually," Brody-Waite says. "However, the cost in time, agility, complexity and mass would have to be significantly lower than the tangible benefit to our company."

When it comes to seeking investor money for an entrepreneurial business, the goal should never be to raise as much as you can.
Instead, your goal should be to raise money only if you truly need it. And even then only take as much funding as is absolutely necessary to reach the goals of the business.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.