So much stimulus, so little to show for it
Sure, the recession is technically over. But after such a massive stimulus, shouldn't there be bigger results?
First, let’s step back and look at the big picture.
In 2007, after 60 years of stretching credit, the US economy snapped.
Savings rates went up…from near zero up to 7%. Houses went into foreclosure. People tossed away their credit cards. Wall Street wobbled…and almost fell.
The feds rushed in, trying to stop the correction.
They threw everything they had into the fight against the big D – deflation, de-leveraging, default, and depression.
Fiscal stimulus, monetary stimulus, unorthodox stimulus – trillions of dollars’ worth. The biggest stimulus program of all time – with budget deficits of 10% of GDP…special stimulus spending on “shovel ready” programs for $800 billion…zero interest rates…and a total of $1.7 trillion in Fed purchases of mortgage backed securities and US Treasury debt.
Well…not much. Unemployment rose to nearly 10% (after President Obama promised that his stimulus program would hold it at 8%). About 30 million people are still jobless.
House prices are still falling. Foreclosures are still rising.
GDP is positive…meaning, technically, the recession is over. But after such overwhelming stimulus (negative interest rates for more than 2 years)…you’d expect more than a tepid increase.
Besides, who knows what is really going on? The figures are all in terms of dollars. And now, who knows what the dollar is worth?
The feds’ hot money has swamped the world. Food prices are soaring. Oil is approaching $100 a barrel. And a prominent analyst predicts that it will hit $300 by 2020.
The feds say the US core inflation rate is still less than 2%…but the core rate doesn’t include the things that are going up – food and energy. Properly adjusted for real cost of living increases…
…and shorn of the curly growth caused by government’s deficit spending (which it can’t continue forever)…
…real GDP growth might actually be negative!
The Great Correction continues, in other words. Confusing and frustrating…with mixed signals and false starts. And it will continue for a long time. For the harder the feds fight against it, the tighter the ropes become.
The feds’ hot money boosts stock prices. But prices for the raw materials go up too. And food and energy prices paid by consumers. The consumer has less real purchasing power. Business profit margins are squeezed.
Meanwhile, the Fed continues printing dollars – $600 billion of them scheduled for January to June of this year. Alert dollar holders wonder how long it can continue. Shrewd investors wonder how it could stop.
If it takes a $1.5 trillion budget deficit and negative interest rates to produce 3% growth…what would a balanced budget and a 3% lending rate do?
We don’t know. But we know one thing: no one in Washington or in a position of authority wants to find out.
The Financial Times yesterday reported that Mr. Obama will propose cutting $1.1 trillion from US deficits over the next 10 years.
Hey… Wait a minute… That’s $110 billion per year…out of a $3.7 trillion annual budget – a cut (please sit down, dear reader) of 3%…or only 7/10ths of 1% of GDP!
Woo hoo! Hallelujah…
Our problems are solved.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.